Look under a criminal investigation the FBI can not just go and release information any way, Hillary as a former defence attorney knows this.
You are making my point for me. So why did he make the statement in the first place?
Look under a criminal investigation the FBI can not just go and release information any way, Hillary as a former defence attorney knows this.
Because an investigation was already opened, under the evidence provided no charges were brought, although many argue they should have been, new evidence came to light that shows the people investigated had not been entirely forthcoming. Due to this being a current case the announcement was made. Apparently the emails made an appearance on this laptop due to a backup that was performed, something that can and does happen. If it makes you feel any better I still think she will win and no I do not like either candidate.So why is he making the statement in the first place?
This could well happen. And to be honest it could be the best thing. Why couldn't we make a better choice?You know what would make me happy?
Remove both of them from the ballot, keep Obama as interim President for another year, and hold another round of primaries.
The media outlets should like that. They have been making bucket loads of money off all this.
Because an investigation was already opened, under the evidence provided no charges were brought, although many argue they should have been, new evidence came to light that shows the people investigated had not been entirely forthcoming. Due to this being a current case the announcement was made. Apparently the emails made an appearance on this laptop due to a backup that was performed, something that can and does happen. If it makes you feel any better I still think she will win and no I do not like either candidate.
And therein lies the problem the AG has not been working in an appropriate manner during this whole process. Meeting Bill was a foolish thing to do. I mean who flies in there planes to meet on the tarmac and discuss their grandkids?Look, I am one for procedure. And the dude hasn't followed his own!
In this world of people getting off on technicalities, why would he do something so short sighted?
There was no need for the public announcement. If there is something of substance, then quietly gather it up, see if it is credible, and present it to the AG like you are supposed to.
And therein lies the problem the AG has not been working in an appropriate manner during this whole process. Meeting Bill was a foolish thing to do. I mean who flies in there planes to meet on the tarmac and discuss their grandkids?
Also, yes, a very foolish thing to do. Although, remember, for the sake of transparency, the AG is a political appointment.So if the AG isn't going to pursue it, the FBI is wasting their time then.
Not necessarily the FBI can still call a grand jury, they don't actually have to have the AG's approval, that's a big misconception. Comey will not be stopped by Lynch if he feels there is an injustice here.So if the AG isn't going to pursue it, the FBI is wasting their time then.
That is supposed to have an impartial ruling hand over issues like these.Also, yes, a very foolish thing to do. Although, remember, for the sake of transparency, the AG is a political appointment.
The director of the FBI is a 10yr position, he has far more to lose than Lynch, internal wrangling's may have pushed this over the edge with many senior FBI agents angry that no prosecution was brought. Lynch will be finished soon as her term will be up.Not necessarily the FBI can still call a grand jury, they don't actually have to have the AG's approval, that's a big misconception. Comey will not be stopped by Lynch if he feels there is an injustice here.
Not necessarily the FBI can still call a grand jury, they don't actually have to have the AG's approval, that's a big misconception. Comey will not be stopped by Lynch if he feels there is an injustice here.
There was no need for the public announcement. If there is something of substance, then quietly gather it up, see if it is credible, and present it to the AG like you are supposed to.
So maybe I could have explained it better, if the evidence shows there is no doubt this is a serious crime and the AG refuses they can exert tremendous pressure on the President, the last thing he will want is insurmountable evidence put before him. A president leaving office wants a lasting legacy, he in turn would force the justice dept to comply.I concede that one, any chance of a source, so I can educate myself further?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.