And I know I'm being a pedantic git about the terms 'big games' and bottling.
But essentially the question being discussed is given that we win some games and lose others, are the ones we lose the especially important ones? Is our problem not that we're not good enough to win 50 games a season but specifically that we can't cope with the pressure of the important games?
And I think the answer is no. We just tend to lose a certain ammount of games a season. In the fa cup since 1995, when we last won it, we've lost 1 final, 1 semi, 5 quarters, 2 5th rounds, 6 4th rounds and 4 3rd rounds.
If we were a team of bottlers, we'd be excellent in the early rounds but crack under the pressure of the big games so there'd be lots of losses in the finals and semis and few before that. Instead out of 19 seasons, 10 we didn't get past the first two rounds and 9 we did. That, to me, just looks like a not very good team rather than a team that breaks under the pressure.
Incidentally Smith had a much better fa cup record under us than I remember. In 4 seasons here he got us to 3 qfs, which isn't bad.
Under just Moyes, incidentally, it's one final, one semi, one quarter, 2 5th round, 3 4th round and 3 3rd rounds.
Which is why I think he just wasn't very good in the cup rather than actively a bottler. We were likely to lose every game, we didn't get noticeable worse in semis or quarters.