Current Affairs Culture wars & The rise of grifting

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aren`t you interested in it at all?
There`s loads of theories out there and i thought you might have a personal take on it as you said you had studied Kubrick and his films. I`m not on a wu mate, i`m genuinely curious as to what you think about it. For starters Kubrick was very clever picking the bones out of Kings` book as i think the film is way above the novel in terms of maturity, depth and pretty much everything else in between. Stephen King is great but he does struggle with endings and his writing seems mostly to be aimed at teenagers.
It's popular fiction. Let's be real: today's popular fiction is not your grandfather's popular fiction. King does have some very strong works on his CV - Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption, Hearts in Atlantis and The Green Mile, to name three that are very adult and possess very high quality writing.

The other thing to keep in mind is that anyone that prolific will have some clunkers. Asimov has a few - the first two Galactic Empire novels and Nemesis, off the top of my head. There are others. Even Gibson has a few that aren't up to his lofty standard.

Here comes the room 237 nonsense and the moon landing stuff.
There's a substantial audience out there that doesn't review information critically. There's a strong argument that the Warren Commission report is bogus. It fails to explain far too many details that came to light later, there were parties with motive, it wouldn't have required a large conspiracy to pull that off, and everyone involved would have had strong reason to remain silent.

It doesn't follow that the 9/11 Commission report is bogus, or that we faked the moon landing. Sure, you can't get us there and back with a slide rule and an ungodly amount of propellant. The math had been around for centuries, though. It's just that it's tedious.
 
It's popular fiction. Let's be real: today's popular fiction is not your grandfather's popular fiction. King does have some very strong works on his CV - Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption, Hearts in Atlantis and The Green Mile, to name three that are very adult and possess very high quality writing.

The other thing to keep in mind is that anyone that prolific will have some clunkers. Asimov has a few - the first two Galactic Empire novels and Nemesis, off the top of my head. There are others. Even Gibson has a few that aren't up to his lofty standard.
I didn`t necessarily want to come across as a Stephen King basher but i don`t think his writing is either adult or high quality, he`s no Charles Dickens. Kings` ideas are really good- The Stand, The Talisman etc but it`s his skill as a writer that keeps him out of the big-league.
I thought Foundation by Asimov was brilliant, read it years ago and maybe it`s time to re-read it. I don`t think i`ve ever read anything by King twice but like i said, his ideas are great.
I`ve never heard of Gibson.
 
Here comes the room 237 nonsense and the moon landing stuff.
You`ll have to ask @Charro about the moon theory thing as it`s got no real appeal to me. Oh and btw! haven`t you finished that bone yet, you`ve been chewing it a while now, let it go.
For what it`s worth, i`m more interested in the "Wendy Theory"
 
I didn`t necessarily want to come across as a Stephen King basher but i don`t think his writing is either adult or high quality, he`s no Charles Dickens. Kings` ideas are really good- The Stand, The Talisman etc but it`s his skill as a writer that keeps him out of the big-league.
I thought Foundation by Asimov was brilliant, read it years ago and maybe it`s time to re-read it. I don`t think i`ve ever read anything by King twice but like i said, his ideas are great.
I`ve never heard of Gibson.
I'm not saying King is a strong writer by any stretch, across his body of work. I'm saying that he does have some quality output, and that it's unfair to entirely dismiss his capabilities because much of his output unapologetically panders to a mass audience. What sells big at release and what is "great" are two very different things throughout time and space, and the intersection set is not large.

It would equally be unfair to call Asimov a technically gifted writer - Bradbury, for example, blasted him out of the building on that score - but he was an extraordinarily clear one. That clarity made him prolific indeed, as he had little need to revise. In conjuction with his ideas and foresight, this made for a formidable package, but if someone writes hundreds of books they won't all be winners.

William Gibson is a legend, and for cause.
 
Every time your two adorable neurons shoot a little spark across the synapse, I’m always impressed by the psychobabble end-product. As to purpose:
You`ll have to ask @Charro about the moon theory thing as it`s got no real appeal to me. Oh and btw! haven`t you finished that bone yet, you`ve been chewing it a while now, let it go.
For what it`s worth, i`m more interested in the "Wendy Theory"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top