Current Affairs Culture wars & The rise of grifting

Status
Not open for further replies.
"there is no such thing as scientific consensus"

Here's (absolutely in no way a bad faith actor) a fella on YouTube to prove this point.
On "Climate Heating" the science isn`t settled. Prof.@verryslow won`t even acknowledge the simple fact that urban heat islands are relevant or why the climate activists/alarmists have got a beef with oil companies. Maybe it doesn`t suit the Far Left grifters` agenda.
edit- What`s wrong with independent journalists/commentators on Youtube? - You think you are better informed watching the paedophile cover-up cesspit called the BBC? ?????
Grifters gonna grift.
 
edit- What`s wrong with independent journalists/commentators on Youtube? - You think you are better informed watching the paedophile cover-up cesspit called the BBC? ?????

Channels like BBC etc are regulated and actually have to follow U.K. broadcasting and accountability laws etc when they report so yes they are more likely to be a reliable source than some guy on YouTube who can literally say whatever he wants with no negative repercussions whatsoever.

The BBCs audience is also going to be a lot more varied than a youtubers audience due to it being a national broadcaster watched by multiple generations. Youtubers on the other literally report and give opinions that they know their followers want to here because their income is reliant on telling their audience what they want to here.
 
Last edited:
I did, it was a reminder of how objectively dreadful Sky News Australia is, comment section is full of some of the thickest chodes you’ll come across on the internet as well.

most liked comment is ”but believing men can get pregnant is normal”

Wow such a great point, makes you do a big think.

conservatives lol
I just wondered why @Spadge Vernacular would post a video of a guy being sarcastic about "climate warming". I thought the facetious nature of the video had gone over his head like most things seem to.
 
FFS just used “here” instead of “hear” twice in the same sentence, smoking weed in the morning is never a good idea.

I just wondered why @Spadge Vernacular would post a video of a guy being sarcastic about "climate warming". I thought the facetious nature of the video had gone over his head like most things seem to.

im guessing people didnt actually watch it all. I watched it because i was surprised that Sky Australia might have such an outlook on climate change, but sure enough it soon became clear that it was the usual “we are just asking questions” narrative they like to use.
 
Last edited:
Channels like BBC etc actually have to follow U.K. accountability laws etc when they report so yes they are more likely to be a reliable source than some guy on YouTube who can literally say whatever he wants with no negative repercussions whatsoever.
Stop it. ? ? ? ? - it`s too much.
The BBC hold themselves up as an "official source"- says who? Themselves? Ok i`ll go along with that. Can i go and mark my own exam paper too?
Admittedly, you do need a filter system to wade through Youtube B/S. That`s were the "asking questions" and being discerning comes into play - like the "Don`t question the narrative" waffle that the Sky News Australia guy was mocking in @Spadgers video
 
FFS just used “here” instead of “hear” twice in the same sentence, smoking weed in the morning is never a good idea.
im guessing people didnt actually watch it all. I watched it because i was surprised that Sky Australia might have such an outlook on climate change, but sure enough it soon became clear that it was the usual “we are just asking questions” narrative they like to use.
Wha? Where?

How long did it take you to rumble that the guy was tearing you a new one? ???

edit. Newsflash- don`t do drugs kids!
 
Stop it. ? ? ? ? - it`s too much.
The BBC hold themselves up as an "official source"- says who? Themselves? Ok i`ll go along with that. Can i go and mark my own exam paper too?


No one is saying they are the absolute perfect example of unbiased reporting but i think most sane people would agree the BBC has better filters and quality control than Youtube when it comes to reporting. It's a national broadcaster funded by the public, it has to at least try or in your mind 'pretend' to be somewhat impartial, literally anyone can create a youtube channel and say whatever they want and not have to worry about any sort of standards/regulations etc.

This is why Youtube is a grifters paradise.
 
FFS just used “here” instead of “hear” twice in the same sentence, smoking weed in the morning is never a good idea.



im guessing people didnt actually watch it all. I watched it because i was surprised that Sky Australia might have such an outlook on climate change, but sure enough it soon became clear that it was the usual “we are just asking questions” narrative they like to use.
Tbh mate, I posted the link of the Australian news buffoon and the post immediately following it about attention seeking personality types in adults as they are connected and clearly link to this thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top