They always post a BLM YouTube vid. Every single time.
They always post a BLM YouTube vid. Every single time.
They always post a BLM YouTube vid. Every single time.
"there is no such thing as scientific consensus"Yep, dead giveaway. And they get 3x bonus points if they post a video of a black ideologue criticizing BLM as they think it helps shield them from accusations of racism (insert huge LOL).
On "Climate Heating" the science isn`t settled. Prof.@verryslow won`t even acknowledge the simple fact that urban heat islands are relevant or why the climate activists/alarmists have got a beef with oil companies. Maybe it doesn`t suit the Far Left grifters` agenda."there is no such thing as scientific consensus"
Here's (absolutely in no way a bad faith actor) a fella on YouTube to prove this point.
Did you watch that video Spadger?
edit- What`s wrong with independent journalists/commentators on Youtube? - You think you are better informed watching the paedophile cover-up cesspit called the BBC? ?????
I just wondered why @Spadge Vernacular would post a video of a guy being sarcastic about "climate warming". I thought the facetious nature of the video had gone over his head like most things seem to.I did, it was a reminder of how objectively dreadful Sky News Australia is, comment section is full of some of the thickest chodes you’ll come across on the internet as well.
most liked comment is ”but believing men can get pregnant is normal”
Wow such a great point, makes you do a big think.
conservatives lol
I just wondered why @Spadge Vernacular would post a video of a guy being sarcastic about "climate warming". I thought the facetious nature of the video had gone over his head like most things seem to.
Stop it. ? ? ? ? - it`s too much.Channels like BBC etc actually have to follow U.K. accountability laws etc when they report so yes they are more likely to be a reliable source than some guy on YouTube who can literally say whatever he wants with no negative repercussions whatsoever.
Wha? Where?FFS just used “here” instead of “hear” twice in the same sentence, smoking weed in the morning is never a good idea.
im guessing people didnt actually watch it all. I watched it because i was surprised that Sky Australia might have such an outlook on climate change, but sure enough it soon became clear that it was the usual “we are just asking questions” narrative they like to use.
Stop it. ? ? ? ? - it`s too much.
The BBC hold themselves up as an "official source"- says who? Themselves? Ok i`ll go along with that. Can i go and mark my own exam paper too?
Tbh mate, I posted the link of the Australian news buffoon and the post immediately following it about attention seeking personality types in adults as they are connected and clearly link to this thread.FFS just used “here” instead of “hear” twice in the same sentence, smoking weed in the morning is never a good idea.
im guessing people didnt actually watch it all. I watched it because i was surprised that Sky Australia might have such an outlook on climate change, but sure enough it soon became clear that it was the usual “we are just asking questions” narrative they like to use.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.