(bluerinse commented on TEF, this made a lot of sense to me.... its copied in so I'll edit for any language within the ten mins given although not sure there is any tbh)
'One thing that gets on my tits is the partisan commentary we've been getting from the Indian TV feed.
It's like Pravda in that commentary box. So far from neutral you can barely believe your ears at times. At least in the first two tests we had Mark Butcher who was excellent in not being shy to speak out against some of the tripe we saw from the third umpire, that bat pad decision when they didn't even play it on to see what England were appealing for - lol. Replacing him with Graeme Swann is a big comedown.
99% of the time I like listening to Suny Gavaskar but he let himself down in this test, going after Stokes for claiming that catch and having his head in the sand about the woeful pitch they served up.
It made me laugh Gavaskar was going on about nobody ever talking about the home conditions when Stuart Broad took 8-15 against Australia, acting like that was a minefield, which was somehow just as bad, if not worse, than the track for that last test. What Suny didn't mention was England made over 300 in reply to Australia at Trent Bridge and the game went 4 days (iirc) - so clearly, it wasn't that bad a track at all.
England got bowled out for 112 on this and India couldn't even make 150 in their first innings, with Mutiah Murilitheran Joe Root taking 5 wickets for 8 runs against India, no less. If that doesn't scream alarm bells, I don't know what does.
2 day tests are just not cricket and it's as simple as that. Test matches are about the mental battle, showing the patience, grinding it out, chipping away, working hard for runs and working hard for wickets - they're not about bang, bang, bang wickets galore. Every now and then you'll get collapses, I know that only too well following England, but that even happens on good batting tracks sometimes. This one was just a complete joke.
I'm fine to hold my hands up and say England didn't deserve anything out of the test, we were utter sh*te with the bat especially first innings collapsing from a decent start 74-2 to be all out for 112, but none the less, that track was indefensible. There was still a good 2 hours of play left when the game was over on day 2. It wasn't like the test even threatened getting to day 3.
Pitches in the subcontinent usually play like we saw in the first test... Flat on day 1, flat until the evening of day 2 when it starts to go a wee bit, day 3 there's a little something there but you can still make runs on it, day 4 there's definitely gremlins coming through and day 5 it gets unplayable. That's fine. You can argue the toss is too important in these games - but at least you get a few days entertainment out of it, both teams can make some runs on it. You get times when the bat is on top and times when the ball is on top.
What we just saw was historically bad.'