Cricket

Wonder what Michael Holding makes of the cheat Amir chasing the money and retiring from Test cricket...

I think Michael who also recognised the disparity in payments in his own playing career would have every sympathy.

The two situations have startling similarities, Pakistan don't give their test players huge wages, they aren't a rich board at all, play all their matches abroad - even home matches and struggle to attract any sort of income from TV. Their top stars have to play in their own T20 franchise tournament, as the IPL is out of bounds, plus others around the world to make a good living. At 27 he possibly realises that commercially he's at his most saleable and teams will pay well to get him.

In the late 1970s, early 80's Kerry Packer promoted a rival World Series test and one day cricket to that run by the international board at the time, largely by the ECB and their Australian counterparts. Test cricket was extremely poorly run with the players only receiving a comparative pittance for playing.

The West Indies paid buttons and Kerry Packer, an Australian media mogul financed a rival structure which paid the players far more, a fortune compared to the established game. Not surprisingly the West Indies defected to Packer en masse - Michael included, their board always amongst the most financially poor, and World Series Cricket (WSC) was born.

The ICC took Packer and WSC to the very highest court in Lomdon, but embarrassingly lost and the case was thrown out with Packer being found to have no case to answer.

The Australian board had to bow to all Packer's demands in an effort to get the 'rebels' -basically all the good players, back to test cricket. Packer's channel was awarded exclusive rights to all Aussie tests and Richie Benaud who had always championed the breakaway, introduced the first ever broadcast test matches on channel seven in Australia.

Kerry Packer brought lots of innovations to WSC with white balls, floodlight cricket, coloured clothing, imported ready prepared wickets which could be installed at stadia where it would have been impossible to prepare one, marker disks for the inner circle of fielders and much more, all of which although initially frowned upon and contemptuously nicknamed pyjama cricket, has been assimilated into our own one day game.

The Aussie board did all it could to stop Packer before their capitulation, banning test grounds from holding WSC matches, so that the best cricketers in the world often had to resort to playing in greyhound stadiums or stockcar racing ones, using the ready prepared wickets flown in to the stadium.

Holding always maintained that some of the finest cricket he ever played in was in the World Series matches and Packer had done a great service to all test match cricketers.
 
The likely team for Thursday is

Burns, Roy, Denly, Root, Buttler, Stokes, Bairstow, Ali, Woakes/Curran/Broad *, Archer, Anderson.

* Woakes or Broad for me far more likely than Curran


Anderson and Archer, barring last minute injury setbacks, are absolutely nailed on to start. The only place up for grabs is that third seamer and Woakes or Broad (not Sam Curran for now I suspect) the two possibles.

It's hard not to fully agree with the selectors imo that Leach should absolutely have been discarded if Ali plays, the spinners spot being the only possible place he can take. He didn't pull up any trees with his bowling at Lord's.

On the series ahead, it's surely a racing certainty that low scores will be the standout feature. Remember last summer when India came with a hugely formidable and greatly renowned batting lineup and the strongest seam attack they've ever possessed in their history, with Ishant and Shami joined by Jasprit Bumrah for the last three, and a good choice of spin on a hot dry summer. India failed repeatedly to better England's low scoring and the 4-1 result was emphatic.

The critics had an absolute field day last summer and tore into England ripping them to pieces in the press as they triumphed 4-1 over the world's number one ranked team. Whether or not they win the ashes they may well get the same heavy criticism and be equally savaged. When the team enjoys such success it just makes their press mauling seem grossly unfair but it'll still happen as night follows day.

(Tbh the rankings are so flawed as to be scarcely worth looking at)

Australia have Smith still finding his top form after a year off, and just as with England's batters, played a month of white ball stuff and has had problems with the moving ball in this country before. Warner faces similar problems being in ODI mode and only Bancroft is properly acclimatised and could well turn out to be their main man.

Before last summer I predicted an emphatic scoreline to the home team just by looking at recent precedent for England's maulings of India in this country.

This time I would say Edgbaston holds the key, its England's best and most favoured ground, win here and they should triumph overall imo.


Fully agree with most people, we can expect low scores throughout, 250 is a competitive score, even 200 is still in the match. England are weak at the top but with Archer potentially at ten, they bat very long indeed, 24-5 could end up 270 all out.

It's a long time since Australia last won a test series in England, England have won the last 4 or 5 on the spin, England 3-2 for me.

The bookmakers so accurate in predicting England consistently last summer and again in the recent World cup not surprisingly have England narrow favourites to add the Ashes to the World Cup.

England 10/11, Australia 7/4
 
An excellent partnership of 107 between Maxwell (46) and the ever consistent Dane Vilas (73) gives Lancashire a chance. Finished on 151-6.
 

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top