Slightly too short and wide from the England bowlers but only fractionally so, they didn't have too much luck. The openers should be commended for having batted with application and sense, surviving a difficult examination. They haven't got away but they will be glad to still be there, a great start.
The pitch did ease throughout the day, even if it's still by no means an easy or straightforward one. There's still plenty in it for the bowlers and one wicket could bring a clatter.
I do find it far too easy to blame the batting today and then group it together with the Barbados failure and say nothing's changed, they should have found a way. This for me misses the major differences and just how completely different it was, up and down movement, unpredictable bounce, shooting from a good length or keeping low, good sideways movement, all done at pace on a green and unevenly grassed pitch, adds up to a minefield for me. It's nothing like comparable and mitigating reasons are a plenty.
This was far from a normal tricky first morning test match wicket, but something altogether much worse, substandard would be an undeserved compliment. David Lloyd compared it to a park wicket with great clumps of grass taken out. It still has the ridges but the effect of early morning rain and a strong green tinge are going or gone.
180 for me was par for batting first, going by how the wicket played this morning, and would have been very competitive if the wicket had played that way throughout. It did ease as the day wore on and starting this evening was absolutely far more preferable.
Batting second, it isn't easy but nothing like as difficult, so perhaps 300 is a par score batting second.
Many will blame the toss perhaps because it obviously was a major factor, the mitigating circumstances were there for everyone to see. It just seems senseless to underplay it.