Chris O'Connor
Player Valuation: £35m
The Ghost of Christmas Past comes calling tomorrow as the Bristol incident of September 2017 is trawled through all over again.
As the article explains.
First glances are sometimes misleading and this case is not as straightforward as is sometimes presumed. For a start, Stokes has already been cleared of the charge of affray at Bristol Crown Court and looks set to remain insistent that, apart from staying out later than was wise, he has done very little wrong.
For that reason, the CDC - which claims to be an entity independent of influence from the ECB or beyond - has assembled an especially experienced panel and permitted legal representation for the players; something it says it will do only in "the most exceptional case" in its own regulations
The case will be heard - and hopefully concluded - over two days this week. Hales will appear before the panel on Wednesday morning, with the expectation that Stokes will appear later the same day, with the possibility his testimony will run into Friday. A verdict - and the announcement of any potential sanctions (fine and bans are both possible) - is also expected on Friday. It may or may not be relevant that the ECB are holding their Christmas party that day; an early announcement is anticipated
It may also be deemed relevant that the two men at the heart of the case, Kai Barry and William O'Connell, praised Stokes as "a hero" for saving them from homophobic abuse and attack. A key moment in the court case came when a fellow defendant, Ryan Ali, accepted that video footage showed him attacking Hales and Barry with a bottle. Stokes is therefore likely to argue his action were proportionate and responsible.
It is worth noting that several other members of the England squad have already been punished for their part in events that night. It is understood they received fines of between £1,000 and £2,000 and written warnings as to their future conduct. At least one of them is understood to have returned to the team hotel later than Hales. The CDC panel may struggle to justify substantially tougher penalties
There is an important distinction between the players, though. For while Stokes has already, in effect, been suspended for the Ashes series - he also lost the England vice-captaincy - Hales has missed only two ODIs (also missed by Stokes) at the end of the 2017 summer in the immediate aftermath of the incident. That could leave him a little more vulnerable to any further sanction, especially as he is currently not a first-choice member of England's ODI side. Put simply, Stokes already has time served in the bank. Hales does not.
Furthermore, while Hales was not on trial in Bristol - he was never even arrested - some his actions on the night in question may well require explanation to the CDC, not least the suggestion that he had only arrived on the scene after the incident. Copious CCTV footage suggests that was not true.
There was also the suggestion, from Stokes' defence team, that the most serious injury sustained in the episode - Ali's broken eye socket - may have been caused by an apparent kick to the head by Hales.
The smart money would appear to be on a fine for Stokes and perhaps a fine and suspension for Hales, plus warnings for both on future conduct, although suspensions are still possible for both.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_...vents-bristol-ecb-hearing-begins?platform=amp
As the article explains.
First glances are sometimes misleading and this case is not as straightforward as is sometimes presumed. For a start, Stokes has already been cleared of the charge of affray at Bristol Crown Court and looks set to remain insistent that, apart from staying out later than was wise, he has done very little wrong.
For that reason, the CDC - which claims to be an entity independent of influence from the ECB or beyond - has assembled an especially experienced panel and permitted legal representation for the players; something it says it will do only in "the most exceptional case" in its own regulations
The case will be heard - and hopefully concluded - over two days this week. Hales will appear before the panel on Wednesday morning, with the expectation that Stokes will appear later the same day, with the possibility his testimony will run into Friday. A verdict - and the announcement of any potential sanctions (fine and bans are both possible) - is also expected on Friday. It may or may not be relevant that the ECB are holding their Christmas party that day; an early announcement is anticipated
It may also be deemed relevant that the two men at the heart of the case, Kai Barry and William O'Connell, praised Stokes as "a hero" for saving them from homophobic abuse and attack. A key moment in the court case came when a fellow defendant, Ryan Ali, accepted that video footage showed him attacking Hales and Barry with a bottle. Stokes is therefore likely to argue his action were proportionate and responsible.
It is worth noting that several other members of the England squad have already been punished for their part in events that night. It is understood they received fines of between £1,000 and £2,000 and written warnings as to their future conduct. At least one of them is understood to have returned to the team hotel later than Hales. The CDC panel may struggle to justify substantially tougher penalties
There is an important distinction between the players, though. For while Stokes has already, in effect, been suspended for the Ashes series - he also lost the England vice-captaincy - Hales has missed only two ODIs (also missed by Stokes) at the end of the 2017 summer in the immediate aftermath of the incident. That could leave him a little more vulnerable to any further sanction, especially as he is currently not a first-choice member of England's ODI side. Put simply, Stokes already has time served in the bank. Hales does not.
Furthermore, while Hales was not on trial in Bristol - he was never even arrested - some his actions on the night in question may well require explanation to the CDC, not least the suggestion that he had only arrived on the scene after the incident. Copious CCTV footage suggests that was not true.
There was also the suggestion, from Stokes' defence team, that the most serious injury sustained in the episode - Ali's broken eye socket - may have been caused by an apparent kick to the head by Hales.
The smart money would appear to be on a fine for Stokes and perhaps a fine and suspension for Hales, plus warnings for both on future conduct, although suspensions are still possible for both.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_...vents-bristol-ecb-hearing-begins?platform=amp
Last edited: