People who discuss politics with me know I'm as statist. I think that the state should be involved more not less in people's lives. I believe it's the only way of tethering the excesses of the so called "free' market, which, untethered, can destroy people and their communities through naked self interest.
Here's my question: under these extraordinary circumstances, wouldn't you rather we had a strong state laying down some potentially unpopular decisions as a precaution to save lives than what we have right now: a government trying to stand back from making serious decisions?
One thing that should already be in place, for example, is a ban on large gatherings / assemblies. Yes, and that means football matches too. We need to see a 3 day week announced to cut down on contact at all larger units of production - with full pay. We need to see an end to people hoarding food and hygienic products and medicines (we all know that's going on).
To my mind, we have a government failing to take command. 'Wash your hands to the tune of 'God Save the Queen'" is no replacement for a sensible policy on public assembly, employment practices and commercial activity.
So, more intervention and control - thoughts?