True..Optionally, that's fine.
By government order, no, that's not fine.
True..Optionally, that's fine.
By government order, no, that's not fine.
She's more right than wrong - preventable illness in the workplace is a big problem, and facemasks for healthy people were not something we really understood here in the West.Due to the imposition of it in terms of measures.
She supports official measures for it "forever". That's a hard no as far as I'm concerned.
Indeed we all get things wrong it's about learning from mistakes and only 2 days later this post was an outlayer, so I'm half better at prevention than entire Government, not bad for someone who is neither politician or expert in virology, like to think it's my lefty woke principles that allows me to adapt, with good dose of personal stoicism.
As for the 10% I stand by that vaccines we have are not 100% effective.
Anyway, enough about me one will develop an internet ego none of us want to be that, but I have to ask, are you one of the many Grant Shapps internet personalities?
Made me laugh too, said as if he's the only person in the world aware of this fact, or that it in any way excuses the blatant lie that "10% of those who have been fully vaccinated will become seriously ill with coronavirus". Comical.I'm sorry but lol at this.
She's more right than wrong - preventable illness in the workplace is a big problem, and facemasks for healthy people were not something we really understood here in the West.
Getting colds and agues at work absolutely sucks (like that even needs stating) and is a symptom of sick work cultures - people too afraid / unable to take days off (plus some absolute cretins who think it's OK to come in to work with a heavy cold when they could easily stay home).
Her comments are sensible in that context - it's a bigger question than just government covid regs.
I think quite a few people will continue wearing masks indefinitely...
It will certainly be strange going shopping and not wearing one.
The price of the freedoms we have.
Again, if people choose, of their own free will, to wear masks, all power to them.
The government, however, has no right whatsoever to mandate it.
Of course it does - it does already, for loads of preventative measures brought in for disease prevention specifically and health and safety generally.
Those are very simple measures though, that would work. Making sure communal tables are kept clean is not communism.
But just how good will it be?I think quite a few people will continue wearing masks indefinitely...
It will certainly be strange going shopping and not wearing one.
But just how good will it be?
Some people will continue to wear masks but I think 99% of people
will ditch them completely as soon as it is possible.
Better hygiene through hand washing etc is something that everyone has learned from this and I'd hope that we'll see the benefits of that long term. But saying masks should be mandatory indefinitely is a lot different than encouraging people to continue to maintain good levels of hand hygiene.
Why? Millions of people have worn masks on buses, trains, tubes and so on without the world coming to an end and we’ve seen how they work at controlling disease.
Yet apparently telling people to do it, even though we know the benefits and know the impact of pandemic disease, is daft?
So we ban smoking, alcohol, processed foods and lets throw in gambling as well?Why? Millions of people have worn masks on buses, trains, tubes and so on without the world coming to an end and we’ve seen how they work at controlling disease.
Yet apparently telling people to do it, even though we know the benefits and know the impact of pandemic disease, is daft?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.