All Hancock is done with that performance is mean the Tories will be subjected to constant questions until they address the supply issue properly now.
Got to imagine there'll be an uproar because everyone will assume the timetable will now be pushed back, even if it actually won't be.
Good point, I’m not seeing this as “suicide fuel” right now. It’s like they saw this coming and made sure there was enough supply for the long run before April.Let’s put it this way, there is zero chance he’d be saying “we’re on track” with the rollout if the NHS knew there was a large supply issue ahead - the Govt have somehow built up a lot of goodwill from the public due to the rollout - if that was in jeopardy they’d simply say as much, as they literally have no control over supply.
Think about it logically.
They have a plan to vaccinate all adults by a set date.
Simultaneously, they have an NHS England letter saying vaccine supply will be delayed by a month.
So, apparently, the supply will be delayed but the roll out target will still be met.
That doesn't add up mate. Something is wrong.
So what about the other times GP’s have been warned about supply over the past few months? Is it not plausible (or indeed actually quite probable) that similar warnings have been made over the past few months, but just not leaked to the media along the way?Think about it logically.
They have a plan to vaccinate all adults by a set date.
Simultaneously, they have an NHS England letter saying vaccine supply will be delayed by a month.
So, apparently, the supply will be delayed but the roll out target will still be met.
That doesn't add up mate. Something is wrong.
Personally, (and again, I can only base this on anecdotal information), I think it’s precautionary. Logic states that if there’s even a small chance supply will be constrained, they need to pre-warn GP’s/Vaccination centers to ensure that every person due to receive their second dose does so.Good point, I’m not seeing this as “suicide fuel” right now. It’s like they saw this coming and made sure there was enough supply for the long run before April.
Yep, it was said after the conference that this could not be the first time that letters have been sent out like this before.So what about the other times GP’s have been warned about supply over the past few months? Is it not plausible (or indeed actually quite probable) that similar warnings have been made over the past few months, but just not leaked to the media along the way?
I think this is a bit of an overreaction in all honesty.
I assumed it was because the EU would be cutting us off from any supplies from AZ sites located outside the UK.Something dodgy going on here. The word has been that the system was briefed to massively increase jabs this week onwards; now the reverse is the case.
Why?
My missus had her first jab 12 days ago and this morning had a letter from Betsi Cadwaladr HB calling her in for this Saturday!! It can’t be for the second one obviously, so wtf are they doing? They really are an absolute shambles of a health board.
This will certainly be part of the problem. It really is disgraceful behaviour by the EU. Risking countless lives.I assumed it was because the EU would be cutting us off from any supplies from AZ sites located outside the UK.
This will certainly be part of the problem. It really is disgraceful behaviour by the EU. Risking countless lives.
Really starting to wonder why I was such a big remainer over the last few years.
Yes I also addressed that in my earlier points.Clinically very young to be having cerebral thrombosis all 20-50.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.