Giz a jab
I can do that
I can do that
Dangerous term. Vast majority of vaccination effectiveness from first dose, it's hard to argue the UK have probably got the right idea by spacing them out, especially after the latest AZ research. Educated risk is a thing; the UK method from the AZ vaccine alone will probably save thousands of lives compared to if we hadn't done it.
There's no point in trying to spin the vaccine story - the UK has nailed it, the EU didn't.
Absolutely not. Being lashed is no excuse to empathize with a bunch of public school Tory rats.No, do you think it may help see Boris and chums in a different light if i were lashed?
“Dangerous term”?
Do me a favour, or better yet tell us which vaccines for COVID have been approved in the UK that are single dose. You might also at least acknowledge in that post that Pfizer haven’t backed what we are doing with their drug, which we’ve given to the most vulnerable.
No mate its all even mate, to be fair mate, I see your point mate, lets hope so mate, mate yeah the government could have done better mate.... but, mate mate mate
It's dangerous because its suggesting there's no actual vaccination benefit until the second dose, when they're "actually" vaccinated.
That is untrue. The second shot is a "booster" which prolongs the effect - studies are now indicating for AZ that the vaccine acts as fully intended for 12 weeks after the first shot.
I would think Sputnik V will not be used in the U.K. , nor will Sinopharm from China. The EU can use whatever they want. Germany will be quietly buying up its own supplies of whatever it wants, having driven the 27 to let the EU sort them out previously. Hungary is buying the Russian and Chinese vaccines, and you can see why they are, and why Macron is in the crap.....
View attachment 116488
not being contrary here but I've seen plenty of people who are remain voters or definitely more left than right also bashing the BBC, and the other major channels. Both sides do it, that's my point.
I have this argument with my dad - who is older and yeah becoming a bit more conservative in his ways - all the time. If everyone's p***** off, then I reckon they're pretty impartial.
Papers and editors pick and choose their fighters. It's just how it works. People need to stop bloody chebbing about it like we live in Russia or Saudi Arabia. Not saying you're doing this, because I agree with you mate that there is a lot of elements that are biased, but as an entire entity, it's not.
He'd be a journalist and doing his job if he didn't work for the Times.
BBC news presenters have to be impartial and neutral when it comes to matters like Brexit and elections, which is probably the reason why its my main goto for news online , Radio and via the TV.
A few years ago Murdoch and the othe papers were trying to force Cameron and Osborne to restrict and scale back the BBC's online presence as it was the number one website for news.
The narrative of the media has changed in the last decade and by the looks of things it will move further right. We now have an ex Tory councillor as head of the BBC and Johnson is about to appoint Paul Dacre to head up Ofcom, the former Daily Mail journalist and editor.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.