To respond to this post and your one to me, I agree that there has probably been some exaggeration from an exhausted and frustrated health care worker. You probably saw/heard the other five live clip from yesterday where a doctor said (I’m paraphrasing) that if you didn’t wear a mask/social distance you had blood on your hands. That OTT language (whether you agree with the substance or not) can have the desired effect of instilling some fear and subsequent compliance into people but it can also backfire and have negative repercussions which is what we’re seeing now with general lockdown/restriction fatigue. You keep telling people the sky is falling in and unless it happens to them, then they don’t care anymore.
One thing which could get people focused again however is if children were seriously starting to be seriously effected by this. If statistics and stories were to come out indicating this then the case for a lockdown with all schools closed would be undeniable.
Indeed, but key word is "if". Right now, there's no evidence at all for it - indeed
there's more evidence that kids get hit harder by the flu than COVID.
So right now an emotional radio call in can be disregarded given there's no actual evidence to back up her claims. It might
feel hard for her personally but she's basically in a war zone situation right now, so exhaustion, panic and fear can alter her rationale.
As it stands, the situation with kids is simply about being super spreaders. To quote a completely random tweet that just happens to nail it...
It really is this. There's an element of child protection in regards to education being important, but another month or two isn't going to be the end of the world for them. But the reality is the economic hit is the reason schools aren't closing nationally.