Just close loopholes preferably. If you can't socialise with people at home then don't apply rule of 6 to anywhere outside of the house.
Literally if I was a drinker then these local lockdowns would not have effected me in any way for a social life. If you are trying not to spread a virus further, then social life should be the first to go in the short term
What about the balance between health and the economy ?
I was reading an article last night that predicted that one in four jobs in the hospitality industry could go by Spring 2021.
That`s not just people who work directly in them, but included delivery drivers, cleaners, maintenance staff, caterers, brewery staff - I could go on.
All these people pay taxes, that would no longer be getting paid and would then go onto benefits.
Some would invariably lose their homes, split up from their families, meaning the State would be picking up the pieces from that, without getting into the social problems that arise from this.
Local shops and businesses in these areas would suffer / go bust, as people wouldn`t have the money to spend anymore.
Crime, drug / alcohol abuse goes hand in hand with unemployment, meaning more pressure on the Police, hospitals etc .
So it`s a balancing act, between trying to stop all of the above, whilst at the same time trying to keep the lid on the virus as best as we possibly can.
As for the 10pm rule, my take on it, is that it`s there to put the brakes on the youth, who seem to be driving the spread at the moment.