Yeah that was my whole point haha - both as risky as the other for different reasons.
Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!
- Thread starter bullybeef
- Start date
- Status
Yeah that was my whole point haha - both as risky as the other for different reasons.
Good job I'm getting my mop chopped today then!
But I guess you can only lockdown one or the other. If they locked down neither and spiked, people kick off. Lock down both and people kick off.
Gov need to try keep the R down whilst also stopping people kicking off. They can't win.
dead_soft
Player Valuation: £35m
People to blame: People protesting against inequality, people going out for beers that aren't ForeverBlue92
People exempt from blame: ForeverBlue92 when he wants a cocktail or goes to work as a Scouse Batman rounding up Islamists and peadophiles
Absolutely. As much as it pains me to say it, I think Johnson has done the right thing. Well, in theory. Enforcing it is a whole other issue.
Won't happen. Nothing will change but they've at least tried to make the statement.
Kenshin
Player Valuation: £40m
Except I'm not sick? Nor is anyone I have been in contact with since then?
Jesus calm down will you. You won't admit the flaw in your logic to the extent you want to twist it around onto me.
You just won't admit I have a point , laughable really.
Unless you do genuinely believe visiting a house is more dangerous than the places where someone would in fact get the virus to make it a risk.
Just relent rather than acting like a child.
ForeverBlue92
Player Valuation: £80m
**yawns loudly at the bot**
dead_soft
Player Valuation: £35m
*puts his tongue in mouth and we passionately kiss as time slows down for us*
But you're more likely to catch the virus in households and there is scientific evidence to suggest that. How do people catch it indoors? Maybe from ignoring social distance rules with others. I've never once suggested supermarkets are a COVID-free zone but I'm certainly more confident I'll catch it at a houseparty than a 20 minute masked up trip to Asda.
It's beyond common sense but you get shown up in this thread daily for being a clown so no change here really.
Toast
Player Valuation: £80m
*swallows bit of sick reading post
Catfish Blues
Player Valuation: £15m
That's what's been reported, and it sounds about right.
Heathrow CEO says airport testing plan would cost passengers 150 stg
The cost of having a coronavirus test at the airport would be about 150 pounds ($195) per person and the passenger would be expected to pay, said Heathrow Airport chief executive John Holland-Kaye.
So, and it's only in the planning stage at the moment, you wouldn't have to take a test, but if you did, and tested negative, and test negative again anywhere from 5 days and upwards later, then you can come out of quarantine early.
If you choose not to be tested, then you're in quarantine for 14 days.
Costs include the test kits, the machines to carry out the tests on and the people to carry out the process. Realistically, it's hard to see those costs coming down below £100 / person.
Kenshin
Player Valuation: £40m
But again the only reason visiting a house would be a risk is if the person there caught it at a supermarket / pub / gym / shop etc.
How can you not see that? Yes you can pass it on easier directly sat next to someone in their house obviously . But for them to have anything to pass on they have had to have caught it outside the house to begin with?!
And yet it's fine to go to those places?!
Tea_drinker
Player Valuation: £15m
This is getting to be more complicated than brexit. The lockdown thing was presumably working till cummings did his joy ride and since then people got bored and used cummings as an excuse. The only balance is that people who are scared should stay at home and not recieve visitors.
It'll be alright they will all pack into the nearest alehouse before and after the racing then go in and sit a metre apart, what can possibly go wrong?
- Status