Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm lost for words, I was watching the news and they mentioned that college students in America were having coronavirus parties where they invite infected people and bet on who'll be next to catch it.. I was telling my wife about it and I actually felt stupid as the words were coming out of my mouth.. anyone caught doing that should be chemically sterilized so the can't reproduce.
 
I'm lost for words, I was watching the news and they mentioned that college students in America were having coronavirus parties where they invite infected people and bet on who'll be next to catch it.. I was telling my wife about it and I actually felt stupid as the words were coming out of my mouth.. anyone caught doing that should be chemically sterilized so the can't reproduce.

Excuse my ignorance, but isnt Alabama the sort of state that believes stuff Trump says?

Ergo, a bit, well, very thick?
 
The Chinese government has never and will never be elected to make sure that the citizens of the United Kingdom are safe from harm.

But I'm almost certain they would have done a better job than the murderers we have.

Not sure if piss taking if I am honest.

But elected or not. This thing has Made in China on it. Yeah, Johnson et al have made a horlicks of it, but the thing wasnt made here.
 
Excuse my ignorance, but isnt Alabama the sort of state that believes stuff Trump says?

Ergo, a bit, well, very thick?
Not sure if piss taking if I am honest.

But elected or not. This thing has Made in China on it. Yeah, Johnson et al have made a horlicks of it, but the thing wasnt made here.
You cant make these 2 posts after each other surely?

It wasn't made anywhere mate, its a process of nature.
 
Adjusted for double counting, which was known about, but that's why there is such a dramatic reduction.

The time series has been revised though, so there is now data on cases going back to February.

I have been saying for some time 'don't trust the data too much'.
I expect it's more likely due to checking the accuracy of the data (double testing) than bureaucracy.

It's been a while since I dealt professionally with the likes of PHE and the Dept of Health, but one of the things I remember is that, like most govt departments and quangos, they were overly obsessed with accuracy.

Sometimes the trend is the important thing, so it doesn't matter so much if the absolute answer is right or not. So long as the inaccuracy is relatively constant across time and geography, then it should have been possible to spot trends occuring.

They might not want to share that info with the public, but local public health officials would have understood the limitations of the data and been able to work with it, caveated with the understanding that the absolute numbers would need to be adjusted downwards once the duplicates had been removed.

Plainly if the ( percentage ) inaccuracies were wildly different over time, or more important, geography, then it would be impossible to trust the numbers at all, but my gut reaction would be that, at national level, there was likely to be too much angst associated with accuracy, and a more pragmatic viewpoint may well have been beneficial.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top