You've not understood my post.
The argument isn't that social distancing is counter productive, it's that social distancing measures introduced too soon are less effective and therefore counter productive.
As above, we intuitively feel that we should act as soon as possible. The experts tell us differently. They do this having studied hundreds of outbreaks, assessed countless responses. Modelled all of this in simulations. etc etc.
You may know better than them, I don't pretend to.
Lord goldsmith, an expert, once advised that a war of naked aggression on a sovereign state was legal. Or at least that's what we the public saw (although few believed it even then) we know now he had major reservations and can deduce what really happened, and what always happens in such situations. Malcolm Tucker goes to work!
I would actually agree though that timing
is important. Aggressive measures would probably have been pointless a few weeks back, but we know the trajectory of this disease, and we know that a few hundred cases now will be a few thousand very soon, and that these numbers will rise exponentially, the collapse of the healthcare services a genuine possibility.
They don't need computer simulations, merely to look at the numbers it Italy a week or two ago, when they were similar to ours and the government reacted inadequately but still more aggressively than ours is doing! Read what their doctors on the front lines are saying.Get ahead of it before its too late...
If they are looking at computer simulations, and ignoring the actual virus itself that
is actually running rampant through Iran and Italy then god help you all...