Current Affairs Coronavirus Politics Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nicola Sturgeon accusing PHE of redirecting ppe to England .....

Speaking live on television this afternoon Ms Sturgeon said: 'I hope nobody thinks this is in any way a point of a political nature....

...Of course not Nicola....,who would think that......
 
"100,000 testing per day by end of April." Currently on 14,000 per day and none of them antibody testing.

This Comical Ali government need 'kin chasing.
 
Germany now has more people who have recovered from coronavirus than active cases, just over 50% of those have recovered.

In Spain, 37% of the 166,831 people infected have recovered.

In Italy 22% of 156,363 have recovered.

In France 21% of 133,670 have recovered.

In the UK 85,208 people have tested positive, but only 0.3% have so far recovered.


Just look at those figures. An utter 'kin disgrace.

The Tory cult have spent the past 5 years talking about Britain being able to go it alone in the world: "the 5th largest economy".

Under them the country is completely humbled. An international disaster zone.
Yes but the Germans gave been cheating ,they have been testing people in there droves.
 

The Thai government can afford to buy a ton of military hardware, including submarines and aircraft carriers from China, but can't afford to give much help to its own people.

For shame.
 

Tedros and his cronies in the WHO have blood on their hands. Sure, given his history, that's something that Tedros is used to, but his mates? Maybe not.
 
Just my hap'orth on this, we have seen 3 viruses emerge from the same part of the world, Swine Flu, SARS, and now Covid-19.

As just an ordinary joe, I'm skeptical in the extreme at the death figures reported by China for Covid-19 and their ability to contain the spread largely within Wuhan province.

If lessons can be learned from their handling of the outbreak, then well and good, but surely there will a huge global body of research on the true causes of this virus, even though the Chinese authorities will no doubt attempt to stifle that and continue to capitalise on the economic and political opportunities that this outbreak has presented them.

Even without definitive evidence, the cover-up of information and practices at these wet markets, are in themselves worthy of severe criticism and continuing concerns at the possibilities of a further outbreak, or another strain emerging.
 
Just my hap'orth on this, we have seen 3 viruses emerge from the same part of the world, Swine Flu, SARS, and now Covid-19.

As just an ordinary joe, I'm skeptical in the extreme at the death figures reported by China for Covid-19 and their ability to contain the spread largely within Wuhan province.

If lessons can be learned from their handling of the outbreak, then well and good, but surely there will a huge global body of research on the true causes of this virus, even though the Chinese authorities will no doubt attempt to stifle that and continue to capitalise on the economic and political opportunities that this outbreak has presented them.

Even without definitive evidence, the cover-up of information and practices at these wet markets, are in themselves worthy of severe criticism and continuing concerns at the possibilities of a further outbreak, or another strain emerging.

TBF that emboldened bit is a bit misleading - viruses (and diseases generally) get to be pandemics when they are moved around the world a lot.

China is, and has been for several thousand years, densely populated and one of the biggest part of the global trading network (or networks in previous times) and so diseases from there are much more likely to get a foothold amongst a population and then get fired around the world. Closing wet markets might reduce this sort of thing, but the chances of a disease from China going around the world are far higher than, say, Argentinian or Icelandic diseases.
 
TBF that emboldened bit is a bit misleading - viruses (and diseases generally) get to be pandemics when they are moved around the world a lot.

China is, and has been for several thousand years, densely populated and one of the biggest part of the global trading network (or networks in previous times) and so diseases from there are much more likely to get a foothold amongst a population and then get fired around the world. Closing wet markets might reduce this sort of thing, but the chances of a disease from China going around the world are far higher than, say, Argentinian or Icelandic diseases.

Yet its undeniable that two have resulted from China due to wet markets. We can't control the fact they have a large population; we can control stupid practices that exacerbate the risk.
 
Yet its undeniable that two have resulted from China due to wet markets. We can't control the fact they have a large population; we can control stupid practices that exacerbate the risk.
Only they can do that. And they had already 'banned' wet markets before the outbreak.(Nudge, nudge, wink, wink, etc)
 
Yet its undeniable that two have resulted from China due to wet markets. We can't control the fact they have a large population; we can control stupid practices that exacerbate the risk.

TBF I am not sure that we can - even if they got rid of wet markets (genuinely this time), you are still going to have the rest of the factors present that create the conditions for a pandemic.

Not to talk about blame for a moment, but one of the things that must come out of this is a genuinely global monitoring organization that can have full access to countries to detect, warn, circulate true information and help treat diseases before we get to this sad pass again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top