Hang on, if Sky and BT claim all their money back for this season, can we claim our subscription fees back?
VOID VOID VOID VOID
and arguably every losing bet you may or may not have had?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Hang on, if Sky and BT claim all their money back for this season, can we claim our subscription fees back?
VOID VOID VOID VOID
because THIS MEANS MOREHow is it not a reason? Why don’t you want it voided? I mean why?
Not really ,but it does beat talking to the missusDoes anyone actually miss the football?
If there is one thing that Goat is not short of its sauceCan't be saying this without a SAUCE
In all the arguments about losing TV money why has nobody addressed this? Surely if we play the end of this season and then ruin next season in some shape, the TV deal would be affected again?
Until and if they develop a vaccine life as we know it will never be the sameFirstly, everyone agrees people's live are more important and no risks around safety should be involved; any arguement to jib mass gatherings to play behind closed doors are simply nonsense
specifically, to answer why I dont think it should be voided, it is about the sequential nature of football, one season ends, 12 team get promoted, 12 relegated, 7 qualify for Europe and 4 are crowned winners. This idea of bin this season to concentrate on next is ridiculous, answer me this....
If football gets going with a new season (after voiding) in august (or August 2021 for that matter) and there is another breakout of coronavirus in Jan/Feb, what then? Void that one and go again the next august & the same the year after, void again & then year after that.....
this is not a 2 month hiatus and life just goes back to normal and that's it; seasons are intrinsically linked and the "it's easier to just bin it" just doesn't add up in terms of the good of the game, the moral argument or the right thing to do. When it is safe to play, play the next game, if realistic (ie core of players still in contract and still alive).
If your logic for voiding is it's hilarious to see the RS blow their minds and loose it, then that is absolutely fair and very very funny, bit the
What about all the TV money for next season that they wouldn't get then?
Because next season would be either half a season, or crammed into the shortest space of time possible (with all the domestic cups cancelled - a massive source of income for lower league clubs)
because they're not going to move the Euros back to December like you've previously suggested.
Doesn't that just offset the "sizeable" (2 months worth) chunk of TV money that they'd miss out on this season? That's millions of pounds to clubs further down the ladder, for the sake of the rest of this season?
In all the arguments about losing TV money why has nobody addressed this? Surely if we play the end of this season and then ruin next season in some shape, the TV deal would be affected again?
They would still get that. They'd just get it later in the year than they previously would have been used to.
And they'll feel very little financial consequences because of that as most player wages and costs are being deferred during the period in between, same as for a lot of businesses.
Plenty of assumptions there.
Why are you so sure that future seasons MUST run Aug-May? Why must next season be crammed to return to that schedule? It's meaningless.
Why not? They're about to play a World Cup in November and December. The Euro's have been moved once, nothing to suggest they couldn't be moved again if absolutely necessary. Again, nobody knows how this is all going to play out.
However, what I will say is that, in my opinion the impact on club Football will be considered long before the impact on International football (which happen less frequently and bring in less money typically).
No, because the chunk of TV money, sponsorship money and season ticket money they'd have to pay back has likely already been spent and apportioned.
Would you rather freeze most or all of your outgoings for a few months and not receive a whole lot of income in that period.
OR
Do all that AND pay back a big chunk of cash that you've already had?
Alot of these clubs simply aren't able to do the former, they'll fold, categorically. Not to mention that any new sponsorship money, season ticket money etc that they'd be due for the next season would still be postponed - no business is going to pay out sponsorship money for a season they aren't certain will start for several months (if at all).
It wouldn't, the next TV deal would just commence later.
It’s utter madness! What about all the poor staff at the hotels, probably be paid minimum wage to change Salah, Pogba, or Harry Kane’s bed sheets every day!
At the end of the day, resuming this season is the messiest and most complex thing to do as it stands, and anyone going all around the houses still passionately trying to make a case for it only has one motive. And it shines through as clear as day.
Then football as we know it is dead and buried ,and Manchester City will be the reigning PL champions for the next 30 yearsI have the courtesy to answer your question and give some logical reasons why I think it should be continued and all you can say is... "oh wait I know why" you must be a red. It's childish and nonsensical, i've outlined my logic why I dont think it should be voided if avoidable, something you are yet to do, to the best of my knowledge
again answer this.....
If football gets going with a new season (after voiding) in august (or August 2021 for that matter) and there is another breakout of coronavirus in Jan/Feb, what then? Void that one and go again the next august & the same the year after, void again & then year after that.....