Was a lawyer on the radio the other day talking about this and he said the reason these talks are so complicated are because you can't just "extend player contracts" it really does'nt work like that. He said whilst UEFA and FIFA have lots of power and control and can obviously change any rules and setup within the game they don't have power over contracts as contracts are law. He was using a fair bit of legal speak and terms of which i can't say i really understand tbh, i have been trying to look myself the last few days and learn a bit. Another thing i think some of the kopites seem to forget is that both FIFA and UEFA hate the PL so i doubt they are going to be in any kind of hurry to do it any favours.
I think you are absolutely correct mate. Contract law is the central basis of our legal system and our economic system. It underpinned the Bosman ruling (even if on the face of it it doesn't make sense or act in a fair way for football). The guiding principles of society will always win out.
I'm no expert on law, but I'd summarise by saying;
1) Contracts are king. And you can't change them without the consent of both parties.
2) Employees as a default position have a right to practice their trade. You can't withdraw people's right to partake in employment after the event (it's hard to do full stop).
3) If you change the agreed rules of an event part way through, and a team suffers as a result, they have a strong case for loss of earnings against the person(s) who changed the rules.
4) You can't force people into collective bargaining agreements. It's their individual choice.
Any solution that relies on the above, is structurally flawed.