No, I think the definition of truth is what the problem is. What is a "world class stadium", can any of these no supporters define one in structural terms? Because the idiots across the park are builiding a stadium worth £300m, does that make it "world class".
The illustrations ive seen of LFCs stadium leave me cold, all I think is, what a waste of money ! IMO, The Emirates is a great stadium, Allianze Arena is great, Zenits SP new stadium is great, El Camp Nou will be great after its re-fit, the proposed new Pompey Stadium looks fab.......and before anybody screams at me that we cant afford this type of stadium I say, yes, I agree. Except for Portsmouth maybe.......If somebody had given me a choice between the proposed Kirkby and Portsmouth designs, I would have grabbed the Portsmouth one hands down. To me a stadium has to be as exciting outside as inside ( New camp Nou and Allianz ) and theres will cost £100m
Someone on the toffeeweb article was slatting off Chelski's ground - crap ground they said because we will use the same builders. It was comfortable, unobstructed view, and horrors of horrors had shops near it. .....
It may not be "world class" whatever that means, but it was better than how Goodison is now.
I didnt know Barr built Stamford Bridge ?? it doesnt look like one of theirs, they must have employed and architect then....
As someone else has said, even if we re-developed Goodison, do you think that this could be done with no debt?
Of course it cant be done without debt, ( we know that now ) but I bet £80m could go a long way to building 3 new sides at Goodison....I would even accept basic to keep EFC at their home.....
Finally, did you know that when the jokers across the park build their new stadia (if they ever raise the money), it will be on a 999 year lease?