Call for EGM from Shareholders

[chicoazul]

Im the number one fickle melt on here.

 

[davek]

Good to see. Well done Shareholders Association..that's the real one, by the way, not the Dads Army yes men the club put together a few seasons ago.

 

[DENNIS STEVENS]

Its affordable and only a few miles outside the city. I also just can't see an owner paying the extra 200M for a stadium w/in city limits when the team isn't probably worth 200M.

It also appears that the city doesn't even want us there. Kings Dock was turned down because of NIMBYs. The council bends over backward to give the [Poor language removed] land and in an insulting gesture finds a little sliver inside a cloverleaf and says there you go.

I mentioned Anfield which could be had for peanuts and is a loud and intimiating place to play. I know most KEIOC's would rather move to Kirkby than Anfield but I kind of like the idea of lighting a big bonfire of everything red in the stadium and renaming it. Plus for once the you'd see some actual football played there not that [Poor language removed] on a stick the [Poor language removed] plays. Also it would be nice to hear the [Poor language removed] whine and wish they never left Anfield when their ticket prices are doubled in their new soulless stadium.

affordable in your opinion, some of us think otherwise.
i didn't say anything about an extra £200million - you wouldn't just be plucking numbers from the air would you? nobody can quote a categoric figure for either kirkby or a redeveloped gp or any other option, so the whole numbers game is a bit of a silly argument, especially as you are assuming any new owner would make a particular choice from 2 options you've mentioned, whereas they may have other alternatives to offer, for all we know. hard to say as we don't know who they'd be.

my view from a distance is that lcc do seem to focus on rs & somewhat forget about us, which makes no sense as they should work with both clubs for the benefit of the whole city, but i find it hard to believe they actually want us to leave the city.

kd is history now, but fell through because the board of efc couldn't agree the arrangements for funding our share of the project.

i'm not a member of keioc so wouldn't presume to know their preferences, as you do. my objection to kirkby is not based upon the city boundary issue, but my concern that it won't achieve it's prime objective of giving moyes more money to spend.

the old anfield is an interesting idea, but a new shared stadium is probably slightly more likely than that. would be funny if we did as you suggest & then kept the name anfield (it was ours first), then rs wouldn't be able to use it for the new stadium.