Boxing

Still really surprised at so many writing Brook off.

Yeah, Golovkin definitely has power, but he's barely fought anyone of note, and those he has fought who are somewhat noteworthy are flat footed sluggers for the most like Martin Murray or David Lemieux, who are brave but very easy to hit. He's very rarely been in the ring with someone who moves, and definitely nobody who moves as fast as Brook. GGG is compact, amateur in his style, packs power - but on paper is tailor made for a fighter like Brook.

I really do think GGG will struggle to get to Brook, and conversely I don't think Brook will trouble GGG with his power - but he doesn't hit light either and the volume of punches from angles and getting out of the way before the return comes could see GGG look a bit silly.

I also don't think Brook has the suspect chin the likes of Khan has. For me, the smart money is on a Brook points win, which at 7/1-ish is silly odds.

I'm seeing a lot of comparisons with Jeff Lacy when he came over to fight Calzaghe. Nobody gave Calzaghe a chance and everyone expected Lacy to bang him out in short order - instead, Calzaghe boxed his head off due to the gulf in speed. I'm not saying a repeat is in the offering as I think GGG is better than Lacy ever was, but people aren't rating Golovkin on who he's fought; instead, they're assuming he can take his dominance up to truly elite level.
you completely underestimate golovkin's ability to cut the ring off . He will easily get to brook. Brook will put up a decent go for however long it lasts but He doesn't stand a chance .

I'll accept a months ban of brook wins .
 
This fight is a bit of a joke. The Crolla Linares fight in 2 weeks is a lot better imo.

The fight on Sat will end when GGG wants it to end.

Remember the Rubio fight when he tried to keep it going but knocked him out by accident lol
Can't wait for that fight . It's a cracker .

Chocolitito fights this weekend as well
 
you completely underestimate golovkin's ability to cut the ring off . He will easily get to brook. Brook will put up a decent go for however long it lasts but He doesn't stand a chance .

I'll accept a months ban of brook wins .

I don't underestimate it at all - I just don't think he's been tested against someone who can move, so nobody can say for certain. Anyone can cut the ring off for Martin Murray - Brook though? Different story.
 
The whole 'Golovkin hasn't fought anybody' is a bit of a myth in my opinion. Fought a naturally bigger man in Murray who was a pretty handy middleweight, could've been a world champion on a few occasions. Fought Lemeiux who is a very big puncher and i'd back him to beat quite a few middleweights and he also Destroyed Stevens, Macklin and Geale. If you take the Porter win from Brook's record which could've gone either way, GGG's resume is a lot better. You only have to look at Golovkin's amateur pedigree to know he is a very skilled boxer aswell, hes not a brawler.
 
I don't underestimate it at all - I just don't think he's been tested against someone who can move, so nobody can say for certain. Anyone can cut the ring off for Martin Murray - Brook though? Different story.
Your forgetting brook is carrying extra weight so he won't be as mobile to move around . And BTW other than porter ( who got to brook often) who has brook fought ? Golovkin's record is better than brooks .
 
The whole 'Golovkin hasn't fought anybody' is a bit of a myth in my opinion. Fought a naturally bigger man in Murray who was a pretty handy middleweight, could've been a world champion on a few occasions. Fought Lemeiux who is a very big puncher and i'd back him to beat quite a few middleweights and he also Destroyed Stevens, Macklin and Geale. If you take the Porter win from Brook's record which could've gone either way, GGG's resume is a lot better. You only have to look at Golovkin's amateur pedigree to know he is a very skilled boxer aswell, hes not a brawler.
you've just nailed it . That's a much better cv than brooks .
 
Your forgetting brook is carrying extra weight so he won't be as mobile to move around . And BTW other than porter ( who got to brook often) who has brook fought ? Golovkin's record is better than brooks .

Not necessarily bigger names, but Brook has fought hard fights constantly where he's not been the overwhelming favourite to win, whereas GGG hasn't. The names on GGG's record are all pretty much flat-footed fighters. If Brook was another slow puncher, I'd have GGG 100% nailed to win. But I just don't think GGG has fought anyone even close to Brook's style before, and I have a feeling that GGG is susceptible to movement and hand speed, just because of how compact he is in his style.
 
Not necessarily bigger names, but Brook has fought hard fights constantly where he's not been the overwhelming favourite to win, whereas GGG hasn't. The names on GGG's record are all pretty much flat-footed fighters. If Brook was another slow puncher, I'd have GGG 100% nailed to win. But I just don't think GGG has fought anyone even close to Brook's style before, and I have a feeling that GGG is susceptible to movement and hand speed, just because of how compact he is in his style.
Jo jo spam

Frankie Gavin

Yeah dead hard fights all the time lol
 

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top