Boss_Blue
I will find you and consensually bum you
Get.Not necessarily but I'm just explaining why computer generated scores are what they are.
In.
The.
Bin.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Get.Not necessarily but I'm just explaining why computer generated scores are what they are.
Come on lad
A computer generated score?
If You've sat there today and thought gylfi or Richarlison had a better game then Bernard then you haven't got a clue
I thought Richarlison and Bernard had similar performances but Richarlison had multiple shots and almost scored. Gylfi had a shot cleared off the line. It isn't that ridiculous to think they did more.
The only team that can win a game without shooting is the RS.So because Richarlison had a shot that went wide he had a better game?
I'm not saying I like it. You can know how things work that you don't agree with.Get.
In.
The.
Bin.
The only team that can win a game without shooting is the RS.
We had no problem keeping the ball. We had a lot of problems getting shots and chances. So yes I'm saying the people that actually got shots away had better attacking games. Coleman was also more effective than Digne and since Bernars always gets credit for Digne doing well Richarlison gets some credit for that.But that doesn't answer my question
You're saying Richarlison had a better game because he had a shot that went wide. That is daft mate
Oh hello.On bench now.
He should have a go or cross when he held the ball in their box. Doesn’t do enough attacking wise.
I'm talking about what's best for the team going forward.I'm only talking about today though.