Would you bring Kean or Gordon on from the bench if you needed an attacking option? Based on what we've seen of both so far.
Initially you said Gordon should have been pissed because Walcott, Bernard and Kean were all preferred ahead of him.
Now it's just Kean - he's perhaps the one you could debate.
We're talking about credentials for a place in the squad...
Gordon's 20. Kean 21. Kean has built his credentials. That's why he was playing for Juventus and we paid the money we did. That's why PSG took him, and Juventus again. That's why he's a senior international for the European champions in Italy etc. He has something to his game, we just couldn't get it from him for whatever reason - Kean's fault or Everton's?
Gordon has to start showing
something when he's given the opportunity. Kean did that at Juve, and PSG to be fair. He was woeful for us but still slotted a couple in the league cup last season which is more than what Gordon has managed for us.
Crying to your manager about what you have to do to get in the squad is one thing but it comes down to what you do on the pitch.
Has Gordon shown anything on the pitch to say he deserves his place ahead of those 3 players you mentioned? Not for me.