Did you just compare somebody to Naismith and then use that in your defence?

if McGeady replaces Mirallas![]()
Think you've taken that the wrong way mate.
What I was trying to say is, having watched both players up here in Scotland for a few years, I would've gone for McGeady over Naismith. I genuinely think that McGeady is more influential and more likely to turn a game than Naismith.
Each to their own.
From what I've seen of him he can put in a good set piece delivery and that's about it. He's a very frustrating player to watch.
Mate my cat would offer more than Naismith.
From what I've seen of him he can put in a good set piece delivery and that's about it. He's a very frustrating player to watch.