Best players want to play for the best paying and consistently top teams.
Really I personally don’t think we get anything backThe more this goes on and the more stuff that keeps appearing everyday the more I think any top lawyer, not Morshiri going in and representing himself and the club, the more I think there seems to be so many steps that will lead to the whole thing becoming overturned, the new potential sanction and the old one. I just think any big time lawyer will figure out the holes and make the Premier League look awful in what they have done and are doing. I think the whole thing collapses under Everton’s defence.
Really I personally don’t think we get anything back
I’m not so sure that’s the case now. Two weeks ago there was silence and the subject was a given but since the start of the week with the new charge plus masters appearance, the noise has ramped back up.Really I personally don’t think we get anything back
the problem with organisations like theEPL/FA, are that because it a private club, its their rules, so our Advocate could be super, and lash them all over the gaff, windmilling people left right and centre but the EPL/FA can just respond with, 'I hear what you say but were doing this anyway'. The only recourse then would be the Civil courts or something appropriate.The more this goes on and the more stuff that keeps appearing everyday the more I think any top lawyer, not Morshiri going in and representing himself and the club, the more I think there seems to be so many steps that will lead to the whole thing becoming overturned, the new potential sanction and the old one. I just think any big time lawyer will figure out the holes and make the Premier League look awful in what they have done and are doing. I think the whole thing collapses under Everton’s defence.
Very true and this is very similar in the kind of issues with a body like the PL as to some of the issues with F1 under Ecclestone and Mosley which was covered in the Braun documentary a few months back.the problem with organisations like theEPL/FA, are that because it a private club, its their rules, so our Advocate could be super, and lash them all over the gaff, windmilling people left right and centre but the EPL/FA can just respond with, 'I hear what you say but were doing this anyway'. The only recourse then would be the Civil courts or something appropriate.
What does that mean?Hey I remember the Div 2 days so compared to them days these days are joyous
Football isn’t just about winning trophies although that’s the ultimate aim and there is far more to it
This is the problem. Completely agree any competent lawyer would tear it apart in court.the problem with organisations like theEPL/FA, are that because it a private club, its their rules, so our Advocate could be super, and lash them all over the gaff, windmilling people left right and centre but the EPL/FA can just respond with, 'I hear what you say but were doing this anyway'. The only recourse then would be the Civil courts or something appappropriate
Hello @sam17, welcome to GOT.No our argument is regarding an accounting technicality linked to the stadium.
As has been previously said, the overall loss was much greater, the allowable expenditure was then deducted to reduce our FFP loss, which still exceeded the allowable.
Do you honestly believe that City have not breached any rules? Really!It's not testicles they lack, it's evidence. All they have is the same nonsense CAS threw out.
The RS rejected the idea when their fans told them to. Don't re-write historyThat ESL stuff was a disgrace, I agree.
However, it ended up being theoretical as everyone rejected the idea, including the fans of the teams responsible, and it ultimately came to nothing but a fantasy of money grabbing capitalist business owners. The circumstances are different.
Saying that football fans shouldn't be punished because their team is affected by actions of those that run the club is also the stuff of fantasy though. We all love the game and our team, and the passion football brings out is wonderful, but you're deluded if you think supporters shouldn't be impacted by the highs and lows of supporting their club. That's football.
What next? It's not fair if supporters are affected by their team being relegated due to hiring a crap manager and buying rubbish players? Punish the owner, it was his fault! It's nonsense.
Agreed.That ESL stuff was a disgrace, I agree.
However, it ended up being theoretical as everyone rejected the idea, including the fans of the teams responsible, and it ultimately came to nothing but a fantasy of money grabbing capitalist business owners. The circumstances are different.
Saying that football fans shouldn't be punished because their team is affected by actions of those that run the club is also the stuff of fantasy though. We all love the game and our team, and the passion football brings out is wonderful, but you're deluded if you think supporters shouldn't be impacted by the highs and lows of supporting their club. That's football.
What next? It's not fair if supporters are affected by their team being relegated due to hiring a crap manager and buying rubbish players? Punish the owner, it was his fault! It's nonsense.
I think his point is that it doesnt matter if they did or they didnt.Do you honestly believe that City have not breached any rules? Really!