6 + 2 Point Deductions

[SJB]

Wants to sue his barber.

Possibly a bit harsh on the barber, for all we know he might have requested a style that accentuates that lovely big forehead and the barber obliged.

 

[Moomin]

Not much mention of our mitigation. Player X (Gylfi) is mentioned but not the outbreak of war in Ukraine which devastated our sponsorship finances, for example.
Player X cost us millions and the war even more.
In no way are either of those circumstances our fault and nor could they be planned for.

Outbreak of War wouldn't have affected our finances for that period. But, it will show up in the next set of accounts unfortunately as a big loss.

 

[Moggers]

Illiterate Kopite alert.

A Shaun promise is a real promise....

 

[Connor]

From around 10 mins.

Hmm, Ornstein comes across so differently compared to his other comments on this.

 

[Moomin]

Hmm, Ornstein comes across so differently compared to his other comments on this.

What is he saying on this?

 

[Connor]

What is he saying on this?

Saying stuff about signing Gueye and Doucoure, selling Digne, and the potential for that to be viewed as "reckless"

He was on the Athletic's podcast the other day and was totally on our side, just changed up a bit

 

[davek]

just went on youtube, will be mostly about us havn't watched yet.

That discussion started off on the only live issue now: the size of the punishment.

Ornstein joined it and then dragged it over to the dead issue of Everton's guilt. He's another client journalist of the PL who knows which side his bread is buttered on.

 

[kenada_blue]

It’s mad how nearly everyone involved in football and even people involved in parliament and law all think we have a case and reasons to be aggrieved.

But @gwladysnight and the pricks don’t think we do.

Was about to say the same the Kopite seat sniffer

 

[nevsonlymate]

I’m sure this is the same club who a few weeks ago were outraged that the Premier League had allowed the game to restart when they scored a perfectly good goal? No, I must be wrong.

I think any proper Liverpool fan would look at that banner and go, what don’t support the Premier League, the whole thing is a joke. It’s simply an idiot on the wind up because he has no life.

And is still a virgin

 

[Drico]

Without a doubt...

"We can't look at the past"

Can't we? My God, what a self-serving spiv.

 

[BlueStevie35]

It’s mad how nearly everyone involved in football and even people involved in parliament and law all think we have a case and reasons to be aggrieved.

But @gwladysnight and the pricks don’t think we do.

The top hat has pretty much buried himself in this thread since returning to posting on here 6 days ago when the news came out about the deduction

 

[RD2910]

Hmm, Ornstein comes across so differently compared to his other comments on this.

I don't get why he mentions the total £300m+ loss in relation to the £105m permitted loss, or things Gueye and Doucoure did last season. In my view it totally misrepresents the situation. In a room of people who understandably may not have looked properly into it, he should be looking to be spot on.

 

[kenada_blue]

The top hat has pretty much buried himself since returning to posting on here 6 days ago when the news came out about the deduction

Ricky Ryder innit

Or on the same spectrum

 

[DanEFC92]

That discussion started off on the only live issue now: the size of the punishment.

Ornstein joined it and then dragged it over to the dead issue of Everton's guilt. He's another client journalist of the PL who knows which side his bread is buttered on.

Like that Nick Harris on Lineker's podcast. That was dreadful, and very pro-PL.

 

[lieneverton]

Poor from Ornstein that to say he's a fairly respected journo. I get he has to give a balanced view, and play devil's advocate, but that wasn't balanced at all imo, totally glossed over the mitigation side of things, the lack of justification and the lack of true independence, then emphasised the bare losses and guilt.

Neville seemed to get it, mind.