Current Affairs 2024 POTUS race

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tucker Calls Out 'Media Hysteria Typhoon' Over RFK Jr.


In his latest episode, Tucker Carlson discussed the media's absolute hatred for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who was immediately attacked by the press upon his announcement that he would run against President Joe Biden in 2024.

rfk%20jr1.jpg


"CBS News viewers likely were appalled in its coverage of Kennedy's announcement. CBS denounced the candidate's views as 'misleading' and 'dangerous,'" noted Carlson, adding "The LA Times called him a threat to democracy."


"At the offices of National Public Radio in Washington, a full-blown category-5 hysteria typhoon broke out. NPR devoted an entire segment to savaging Kennedy - not just as a candidate, but as a human being," Carlson continued. "NPR described him as someone who, for his own perverse reasons, has made "debunked and false and misleading claims that undermine trust in vaccines. And who, in his spare time, provides moral support to crazed extremists who "rally under the banner of what they call liberty, or freedom.""

"People Magazine didn't even bother to report a single word of anything Kennedy said!" Carlson exclaimed, "and instead wrote an entire story about his relatives hate him."

"Kennedy Jr. faced censorship on Instagram and YouTube for expressing his views," he continued, adding that RFK Jr. raised questions about "the rise in allergies, asthma, autism, and other conditions related to vaccines," while "the media and medical establishment vilified Kennedy Jr. for his views, calling him a lunatic, Nazi, and extremist supporter."

Carlson then goes into a defense of Kennedy's right to raise questions over vaccines, and the response one gets for doing so.

"Bobby Kennedy won't stop asking, and that's why they hate him," Carlson said.

Carlson then went after debate-dodging doctor, Peter Hotez - who he says will "never debate Bobby Kennedy Jr., but it doesn't matter. Kennedy has already won."

"Hotez attacked Kennedy Jr. and called for vaccine mandates, accusing those who disagree of being white nationalists and Russian agents," said Carlson, who then noted how Hotez chickened out of a debate with RFK Jr.
In closing, Carlson notes: "The gatekeepers are transparently ridiculous. Everyone can see that. And the people have started to notice."

Biden in Danger of Losing New Hampshire: Hundreds Line Up to Watch RFK Jr. Speak in Lancaster, New Hampshire


7AFD3F57-842E-46D7-AABA-5B5DC98D659E-768x540.jpeg


Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently drew a big crowd as he spoke at the Porcupine Freedom Festival in Lancaster, New Hampshire.

The Porcupine Freedom Festival is an annual Libertarian festival hosted by the Free State Project.

RFK Jr. was one of the most anticipated speakers at the event which resulted in hundreds waiting in line to watch the Democratic Presidential candidate speak.



The line was so big many people were unable to attend Kennedy’s speech due to the venue reaching full capacity which resulted in some people listening to Kennedy’s speech through the radio.

LOOK:



In his speech, Kennedy shared his concern with the intelligence community’s influence in DC and told the crowd of Libertarians the NSA was the lead agency in charge of the United States Covid-19 response.



This isn’t the first large crowd Kennedy has received in New Hampshire in the last week.

On Tuesday night, Kennedy spoke at Saint Anselm College in Manchester, New Hampshire where he delivered a speech on peace and diplomacy.

Getting more and more desperate and triggered, I see. If you seek attention--and you clearly do--perhaps just rethink your aspirations for your son to grow up to be a vigilante killer.

Along these lines, and in all seriousness, your statement regarding how you want your 9yr old son to grow up has to be one of the saddest, most dream-killing, pitiable, and weird statements I have ever seen. It is really really weird, and this isn't a dig, so much as it is a cause for concern.

Seriously, just think about it for a moment prior to getting angry: Your aspirations for your son is that they can grab a gun and go kill people based on their own ill-informed judgment when they are 18? That's your key to parenthood? There are tons of 18yr olds who are respectful, responsible, and accountable, but also who have never picked up a gun, traveled to a city they don't really know in a different state, and killed two people. Yet Rittenhouse is your aspiration for your son...his actions are what singles it out for you...not so much the respectfulness, the responsibility, the accountability, but the killing? Surely you can find a better role model.

Maybe take a break from the following: 1) trying to "own the libs" on the internet with specious or false far right nonsense, and 2) being so easily radicalized and angered by right-wing media/politicians who manipulate you to thoughtlessly engage in point 1 but don't actually care about you in the slightest.
 
Getting more and more desperate and triggered, I see. If you seek attention--and you clearly do--perhaps just rethink your aspirations for your son to grow up to be a vigilante killer.

Along these lines, and in all seriousness, your statement regarding how you want your 9yr old son to grow up has to be one of the saddest, most dream-killing, pitiable, and weird statements I have ever seen. It is really really weird, and this isn't a dig, so much as it is a cause for concern.

Seriously, just think about it for a moment prior to getting angry: Your aspirations for your son is that they can grab a gun and go kill people based on their own ill-informed judgment when they are 18? That's your key to parenthood? There are tons of 18yr olds who are respectful, responsible, and accountable, but also who have never picked up a gun, traveled to a city they don't really know in a different state, and killed two people. Yet Rittenhouse is your aspiration for your son...his actions are what singles it out for you...not so much the respectfulness, the responsibility, the accountability, but the killing? Surely you can find a better role model.

Maybe take a break from the following: 1) trying to "own the libs" on the internet with specious or false far right nonsense, and 2) being so easily radicalized and angered by right-wing media/politicians who manipulate you to thoughtlessly engage in point 1 but don't actually care about you in the slightest.
This is the big thing. It's not like the politicians on the left care about us all that much, but they're not out there advocating for the murder of our citizens in various and sundry ways. Denying women life-saving care until they're on their last leg, enabling the murder of citizens by gunshot, denying all but the rich appropriate health care and defending extra-judicial killings (by police and by ordinary citizens) is all impressively reprehensible stuff.
 
This is the big thing. It's not like the politicians on the left care about us all that much, but they're not out there advocating for the murder of our citizens in various and sundry ways. Denying women life-saving care until they're on their last leg, enabling the murder of citizens by gunshot, denying all but the rich appropriate health care and defending extra-judicial killings (by police and by ordinary citizens) is all impressively reprehensible stuff.
No they kill 100,000s of foreign civilians with unjust wars.
 
No they kill 100,000s of foreign civilians with unjust wars.
Which every great power, ever, has done at some point all the way back to antiquity. I don't know what you were expecting, or why you think this somehow justifies own goals. It would be nice if governments with powerful militaries didn't feel the need to use them to advance their ends, but that's not how that one works.

It would also be nice if countries that invested heavily in internal security did not feel the need to use the security apparatus against their own citizens to advance their ends, but that is not how that one works, either. It happens over here, too, just not quite as often. It used to happen a lot more, in certain states.
 
Which every great power, ever, has done at some point all the way back to antiquity. I don't know what you were expecting, or why you think this somehow justifies own goals. It would be nice if governments with powerful militaries didn't feel the need to use them to advance their ends, but that's not how that one works.

It would also be nice if countries that invested heavily in internal security did not feel the need to use the security apparatus against their own citizens to advance their ends, but that is not how that one works, either. It happens over here, too, just not quite as often. It used to happen a lot more, in certain states.
You obviously have no idea how Russians we're being treated in the region before it all kicked off.

You won't hear about that on MSM.
 
This is the big thing. It's not like the politicians on the left care about us all that much, but they're not out there advocating for the murder of our citizens in various and sundry ways. Denying women life-saving care until they're on their last leg, enabling the murder of citizens by gunshot, denying all but the rich appropriate health care and defending extra-judicial killings (by police and by ordinary citizens) is all impressively reprehensible stuff.
I never cease to be amazed by how un-self-aware people on the left actually are when they come out with this kind of nonsense because they always accuse you of stuff they have already done. Then again, may be I'm being slightly unfair on them as a whole when this is the same person that thought there was a good argument for "locking up everyone at Fox News for treason" only last week? A bit of advice, don't just read the stuff you ideologically agree with. It's pretty easy to find out how naive and ignorant you are ...

Here are six videos of Democrats calling for violence or physical confrontations that are still active on Twitter


Dem Senator Tester
@SenatorTester said that in order to take on Trump, you have to “punch him in the face”



Dem Senator Schumer


I can't be bothered linking any more, there's so many of politicians on the left calling for violence. Shall we start with Maxine Waters whipping up the BLM riots? From there shall we say harassing Supreme Court Justices? From there wanting to arrest people without a Covid vaccine for attempted murder or for not wearing a mask? Describing a bunch of people walking through the Congress as a "insurrection" Weaponising the FBI to threaten parents protesting at school board meetings. Trying to jail a former President. One day, you'll grow up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top