Those 45-65 age group and moderate/conservatives numbers are good wrt general as think they were a weakness in Iowa/NH.
Impressive identification and turnout operation by the Sanders campaign.
Tbh the Buttigieg number is pretty decent too even if it doesn’t seem to have been enough to have gained him a great deal of delegates. Iirc he was targeting rural voters again, will be interesting to see the makeup of those first time attendee for each of the candidates.
Looks like the moderate/conservative improvement from earlier two was because Nevada is a more diverse state.
Wonder if the 45-65 shift is for a similar reason.
Those 45-65 age group and moderate/conservatives numbers are good wrt general as think they were a weakness in Iowa/NH.
Those 45-65 age group and moderate/conservatives numbers are good wrt general as think they were a weakness in Iowa/NH.
Seems to be a weird narrative that only exists in the head of the most paranoid Sanders' supporters that everyone is desperate for him to fail... Simply isn't the case.
Orrrrrrrrr maybe that makes the "LOOK! Russia FIXED the election for BERNIE!" from Trump after he loses?So that's two general election cycles in a row that Russia have attempted interference to help Sanders in his campaigns...
Now it made sense in 2016... they were very much on an "anyone but Clinton" tip, with a strong preference for Trump...
This year, a little less so.
There's two possibilities I suppose. One is that they believe a Sanders administration would be more favourable to them and more in line with the aims than any of the other Dems... The other is that by their best calculation, Sanders is the least likely to defeat Trump. Neither is a particularly great look for Bernie. I dearly hope they're wrong on both counts.
I’ll leave the baity first part.Whereas other candidates' supporters tend to like the Democratic Party, Sanders' supporters tend to understand the Democratic Party.
Anyhow, tough night I imagine, but the race isn't over yet.
That... would be a weird reasonOrrrrrrrrr maybe that makes the "LOOK! Russia FIXED the election for BERNIE!" from Trump after he loses?
As if anything in this day/age is normal? Trump is going to lose hte election most likely and claim voter/election fraud. Who the hell knows where it goes from there.That... would be a weird reason
Unfortunately that’s far from the most likely outcome.As if anything in this day/age is normal? Trump is going to lose hte election most likely and claim voter/election fraud. Who the hell knows where it goes from there.
I’m a bit disappointed that you missed including a “drowning sorrows in Chardonnay“ dig, I’d have thought that was a layup.while Gen X #resistance libs spent the past four years on twitter consoling themselves by mocking Trump's hair, indulging childish conspiracy revelries about Russia, and sneering at Sanders' 'young people in the streets',
I really hope that the 2024 primary season is changed, having Iowa and New Hampshire out on their own is anachronistic given the diversity of democratic voters. Hopefully less caucuses as well although Nevada does thankfully seem to have been better run than Iowa (not hard!)![]()
And I imagine that's now a very shaky +11 for Biden.
Interesting to ponder how different the coverage would be if Harry Reid had his way and Nevada went first.
Ok, then let me clarify. Trump will lose the popular vote. That's a big given. IN THEORY he SHOULD lose the stupid AF Electoral College as well but, should he lose, he is going to cry election interference even tho he never complained about it nor did the Senate majority leader do a single thing to protect the integrity of the election.Unfortunately that’s far from the most likely outcome.
And before my learned friend wades in, that’s for the most part regardless of the nominee.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.