Gareth Hill
Player Valuation: £950k
Why?Richarlison in, Lookman out and I'm gonna fewmmmmm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Why?Richarlison in, Lookman out and I'm gonna fewmmmmm
Are people for real, am I the only one that has watched him play, he has quality you can see it from outer space.
All the comments above remind me of those on here at the time we paid 30 mill for a “massively overpriced and overhyped” Lukaku.
The funny thing is people were extatic about signing unproven 35 mill Brazilian winger from the French league during the week and now turning their noses of one who has proven he can do it in the PL, to funny.
Yes. Indeed, I think the fee is reflecting the fact we've thrown whatever they asked for at it to get him quickly, knowing we wouldn't be able to bargain for him due to the relations we have.
In no way do I think this was Plan A. I'm baffled how anyone could think that tbh.
If that's the blueprint for our future, they can consider me on board.It's a big point actually and I know I have said, being able to buy Lozano/Richarlinson from source, as opposed to relying on another club to move first has to be the approach we take in the medium term.
That being said I do think part of this summer is about finding proven quality to quickly shunt us forward. It doesn't look like we arguing for a greater quantity of more speculative players, but a small number of players who provide us the quality we need. I am happy enough with that as long as it's not a longer term plan. The lad has just turned 21 and even though we are paying a lot for him, if Silva continues his development we will be able to sell him on at a decent profit.
Longer term, as we get a more settled team, Silva and Brands have evaluated the squad and familiarised themselves into the role, I think and hope we will begin to take more chances.
Even if Richarlinson flops, we likely make 15-20 million back. That's the difference. If he does well we make 30 million +
Sorry I meant the fee would be 15-20 million.
It's a big point actually and I know I have said, being able to buy Lozano/Richarlinson from source, as opposed to relying on another club to move first has to be the approach we take in the medium term.
That being said I do think part of this summer is about finding proven quality to quickly shunt us forward. It doesn't look like we arguing for a greater quantity of more speculative players, but a small number of players who provide us the quality we need. I am happy enough with that as long as it's not a longer term plan. The lad has just turned 21 and even though we are paying a lot for him, if Silva continues his development we will be able to sell him on at a decent profit.
Longer term, as we get a more settled team, Silva and Brands have evaluated the squad and familiarised themselves into the role, I think and hope we will begin to take more chances.
"JUST SIGN SOMEONE, ANYONE, PREFERABLY SOMEONE BRAZILIAN OR GERMAN"Gone very quiet today.
I hate this mentality, no offense.why does it matter? i dont care if he costs 50 pence or 50 million. It's not my money. All I care about is if he will make us better.
"JUST SIGN SOMEONE, ANYONE, PREFERABLY SOMEONE BRAZILIAN OR GERMAN"
"OH NO, WE'VE LEARNED NOTHING, PLEASE DONT SIGN RICHARLSON"
"OH NO, WERE NOT HEARING ANYTHING ABOUT RICHARLSON ANYMORE! NOW THAT HES PROBABLY OFF TO WEST HAM HE MUST BE WORTH IT, SIGN HIM QUICK"
Yes, that's not the Everton Way is it?Which we don’t. Certainly not by selling our best players.
Yes, that's not the Everton Way is it?
I just find the general populace here amusing