What I mean mate is lookman offered something different and should really be here getting game time rather than on loan when the alternatives are the likes of bolasie. This was my point all along in regards to the youth.
The team shouldn't have all our kids in it for experience, but off the bench and a chance to earn a start is where they will develop for us and not someone else. Otherwise what is the point in having young players here? If they won't get a chance unless the managet is forced to?
For example Harry Kane. He was a very average young striker going back what, 4 years ago? Couldn't get into championship teams like Leicester when they were coming up. You could argue that a top player even at 19/20 should be ripping the pitch up ala arguments against vlasic lookman Davies etc . Yet spurs have him a game and he scored, so they gave him more chances and he kept scoring, and 4 years or so later he has been top scorer 2 years in a row only being stopped again by salah.
So the point of all that is, if spurs had treated him at that age the way we treat our youngsters then lane may not have even got that chance to break through. Same as Rashford at United, sterling at Liverpool etc. I'm not saying that Davis Lookman all the rest will be as good as Harry Kane but if we don't give them opportunities then how are we going to know and why would they want to stay here?