If we HAVE to sell one, we've got big problems.
Voted Barkley. Easier to replace. And our big signings need to go ahead regardless of whether we sell Rom and / or Ross.
Don't think it's as much as a case of 'having to'...
Like, Liverpool didn't 'have to' sell Sterling, but they did because he wanted to go and the money was too good. Same with us and Stones.
We'll sell Rom if somebody comes in with a fee that meets our valuation as the lad wants to leave.
Ross is a weird one. There's supposedly something holding up this contract extension, so we'll have to see. The mistake the club made in this was not renewing Ross's deal a year or so ago.