Transfer Rumour Joe Hart

Banksyefc · August 16, 2016

If he only wants a loan jib him. Permanent deal or nothing. be arsed with his billy big balls attitude. This loan [Poor language removed] is his ego telling him he can outlast Pep.

Bally8 · August 16, 2016

Banksyefc said:
If he only wants a loan jib him. Permanent deal or nothing. be arsed with his billy big balls attitude. This loan [Poor language removed] is his ego telling him he can outlast Pep.

Not sure how this relates, surely it's City choice. A loan with a view to perm deal would suit us, allow money to spent elsewhere on the squad

Joey66 · August 16, 2016

Paul w said:
How many mistakes did Howard make,hes a top keeper maybe out of sorts but still a top keeper,w e would be stupid not to try and get him in.

Timmy should have gone four rears ago!

Joey66 · August 16, 2016

micknick said:
Come on Joey surely you know form is temporary, class is permanent.

Joe Hart has been playing for one of the top teams in England, won league titles and played year on year in champions league- earning numerpus MOTM and clean sheets.

He would be a fantastic signing for us.

I don't agree we have two decent keepers one who is experienced no need to waste money on him not happening anyway?

dublinbluenose · August 16, 2016

Joey66 said:
Timmy should have gone four rears ago!

You've made an arse of that

ToffeeTim · August 16, 2016

dublinbluenose said:
You've made an arse of that

He did like making a rear end of the most basic situations did Tim

bizzaro · August 16, 2016

GoatJR said:
Us winning the league.

Skills and attributes Junior Goat.

Which ones?

ToffeeTim · August 16, 2016

bizzaro said:
Skills and attributes Junior Goat.

Which ones?

Sake Damon. The kid said win the league. The kid gave the perfect answer.

bizzaro · August 16, 2016

ToffeeTim said:
Sake Damon. The kid said win the league. The kid gave the perfect answer.

That wasn't the question.

Banksyefc · August 16, 2016

Bally8 said:
Not sure how this relates, surely it's City choice. A loan with a view to perm deal would suit us, allow money to spent elsewhere on the squad

The noises is that Hart is willing to only consider a loan.

AsiaAsia82 · August 16, 2016

Loan yes but City pay half he wages and he cuts the grass every second week.

Gives us more time to find a better keeper to buy.

Also we can then sell Robles.

Would this be an improvement in our situation - yes

micknick · August 16, 2016

Joey66 said:
I don't agree we have two decent keepers one who is experienced no need to waste money on him not happening anyway?

Ok mate let's agree to disagree. Joe Hart is miles better than the two keepers we have in my opinion, he's had a couple of blips but is a great keeper.

matty1878 · August 16, 2016

micknick said:
Ok mate let's agree to disagree. Joe Hart is miles better than the two keepers we have in my opinion, he's had a couple of blips but is a great keeper.

Till he comes to us and has more blips lol

bring the ghost on · August 16, 2016

bobbydigital said:
Because vastly overpaying relative to what you are purchasing has been proven not to work as a business model in the premier league.

Leicester aside, the league title has been dominated by Man City, Man Utd and Chelsea (the biggest spenders) for years. I don't think Moshiri can/wants to spend on that kind of level, hence the appointment of Walsh to source reasonably priced talent.

However, if we do start splashing some cash (and the signs are that Moshiri is willing to invest quite heavily in the squad) on some quality, established players of the ilk of Joe Hart, I don't understand how that would reflect badly on Moshiri's business model for the progression of the club.