Who would you rather got relegated?

[the golden visionary]

View attachment 341184

I heard they changed their relationship status on Facebook with the premier league to its complicated shortly afterwards

 

[Bryan+]

Leeds for me.

Can't take them, and they were the biggest driver of wanting to sue/complain to the Prem for our point deductions.

No Everton option?

 

[BlueStevie35]

Happy to see Forest go but I’d like to see Burnley go and never be allowed back, while you’re at it put a block on Sheffield United, Norwich and any other team that come up for one season, don’t do much and go right back down. Give us more teams like Sunderland who give it a go, it’s why I hope Frank brings Coventry up because they’ll be motivated on it being their first campaign in 25 years so will go all out

 

[Tommy Chong]

I put Leeds, but then I suddenly remembered this:
View attachment Dyche - Brian Clough Impersonation.mp4
If he fancies doing impersonations, then maybe he should quit football and take it up as a full time job, FFS!

 

[mmmmsnouts]

Forest, if their chairman had a vote in England he’d be 100% Reform

 

[SAFCInPeace]

Forest, if their chairman had a vote in England he’d be 100% Reform

As opposed to the West Ham owners, who are big donors to Reform/ friends of the party?

 

[MikeH72]

As opposed to the West Ham owners, who are big donors to Reform/ friends of the party?

Notts Forest fans and manager are big fans of Margaret Thatcher.

 

[Seathestars]

I like West Ham so would like to see them survive.

I think Burnley for relegation along with Leeds. Both tried to take a giant dump on us when we were at our lowest after the Points mess.

 

[Bohemian Toffee]

None of these have any redeeming qualities. Failing players we could snaffle up, my next factor - who is best placed to recover to mid table next season (if you're going to be bad again, stay up). Who does it do the most harm to? Who will drop into an abyss?

Having weighed all this up, Forest.

Because scabs.

 

[Moomin]

None of these have any redeeming qualities. Failing players we could snaffle up, my next factor - who is best placed to recover to mid table next season (if you're going to be bad again, stay up). Who does it do the most harm to? Who will drop into an abyss?

Having weighed all this up, Forest.

Because scabs.

Is the correct answer.

We don't like scabs.

 

[mmmmsnouts]

As opposed to the West Ham owners, who are big donors to Reform/ friends of the party?

They can both go but sick to my teeth of giant loudmouth fools screaming for everything to go exactly as they want… so still rather see Forest gone

 

[Walken]

Forest will have been flapping it yesterday, I've no sympathy for that club but im glad we have had a little break from the stress of monitoring other clubs results

 

[Paris]

I really, really, really, want to see West Ham go down. The biased London media always try to big them up, but in reality they’re just a cockney Burnley.

 

[Vaughan]

either west ham or forest would be a big win

leeds i have a soft spot for having lived there

i also want more promoted sides to stay up, been a worrying trend last two years with all 3 going down and i think that would be a dangerous precedent

leeds also are a very organised side with a gameplan and spirit, both forest and west ham should be at minimum mid table with wht theyve spent and the calibre of manager theyve been able to acquire, so it would be a shame a think if they managed to stay up simply because of their budget over a more well drilled side

 

[Toffe3m4n]

Forest, then Leeds, then West Ham in that order.

All three sets of fans are tits like.