Well that could send you mad.What the heck is that site about??
I'm all for daydreaming but when he started talking of 'Gordon Lee's successful ten year spell as Everton manager led to the England job' I tuned out.

Well that could send you mad.What the heck is that site about??
They won't.
You asked where it all went wrong.......not why it hasn't been put right.
But where it all went wrong for us was the Heysel ban.
It cost us our best ever manager and led to the break up of one of our best ever.teams.
That it hasn't been put right can be blamed on several factors.
Carter should have shown greater ambition and not taken the easy option by appointing Colin to succeed Howard.
(hindsight speaking here....like everyone else I was chuffed at Colin getting the nod but in retrospect Carter should have moved for someone to take us forward instead of trying to keep things as they were)
Then we had Peter Johnson and all that that entailed, culminating in not backing Joe over the Flo transfer when we still had a chance of making it back to the top. Instead we lost Joe and a sadly diminished Howard came back to the club.
Then we had Bill emptying his piggy bank to buy the club.......a bit like you or me buying a house but not having any money to furnish it.
That is a long litany of things which went wrong for us.
You can take your pick which one it was......but all roads lead back to Heysel.
As for that other lot, who cares why it went Pete Tong for them.....just so long as it did![]()
I meant more the fact that it helped City become what they are Khal,rather than where it went wrong for us,much in the same way that Chelsea be ame a "big" club through luck more than good management/business practiseCity winning the lottery was not where it went wrong for us, that had happened long since, but what it did do was put a giant obstacle in our path back to the top and has made it so much harder for us and indeed Spurs to mount a top four challenge.
Before City it was the era of United, Arsenal and Chelsea passing the title between them with the RS making up the numbers in the top four.
Everton and Spurs usually on the periphery, in fifth and sixth.
Then as Liverpool started to fade and the task should have been "easier", Manchester City win the lottery and they become a top four stalwart.
Sitting here wondering at the moment what happened and how we find ourselves in this situation.
I'm watching both Manchester teams up there, getting the best Managers, spending the highest transfer fees on the best players (in theory) and paying them the highest wages.
I know it is around 3 decades when both teams ruled the League, but it really isn't that long ago is it?
Where did it go wrong for Liverpool football? Will we ever catch up and go past the Manchester duo any time soon?
My favourite bit! Considerable latitude given to the outer limits of fantasy.Well that could send you mad.
I'm all for daydreaming but when he started talking of 'Gordon Lee's successful ten year spell as Everton manager led to the England job' I tuned out.
It does annoy me that man u are buying them selves out if trouble signing Jose and 200 million to spend
How can anyone compete with this
I remember that somewhere on the net is one of those alternative history forums and it includes a football section. One thread re-imagines history with Everton becoming the dominant English and European club in the seventies. I think it had Clough managing us at one point. What might have been, eh?
Why have both Liverpool teams gone backwards? Coincidence?