bluemeanie
Player Valuation: £1m
It's boos and booed not boo's or boo'd. That's my important contribution to this debate.
We may of conceded 4, we may not have been fresh enough to get the 3rd.. who knows? We did however get a point.
The point is he's now getting boo'd regardless of whether the substitution is more defensive, or more attacking and irregardless of the effect it has.
Salvages a point with 2 goals, Heittinga scores the winner. He's making the boo boys look like embarrassingly lacking in footballing knowledge.
I wonder why?
Could it be keeping his options open makes it look like he really couldn't give a ****? or is that just fine and dandy?
I can understand why people were booing Heitinga even though i never joined in but the boos were ringing out around the ground before that for Mirallas being taken off, which was the correct decision. If you want to boo bad decisions fair enough even though its not really a thing that ive ever seen a lot in all my years supporting Everton, but to boo Moyes for making correct decisions is a bit embarrasing really for all involved.Peolple are also saying that it was a protest against the board in some way.No it wasn't it was booing a player cos he was rubbish and it was booing the manager for taking off Mirallas.As professional footballers they should be able to deal with it really.
The only mistake for me was making Heitinga mark Benteke when clearly Distin should have.Failing that Heitinga should have been taken off earlier than he was.
I think Benteke had a lot to do to that decision, he deliberatly targeted Johnny over Distin.
I wonder why?
Could it be keeping his options open makes it look like he really couldn't give a ****? or is that just fine and dandy?
Can I ask, When he took Heitinga off did people boo because:
a) They were booing Heitinga because he had a real stinker of a game
b) They didnt agree with the sub being made?
This is a genuine question, I was quite shocked and whilst I personally have always thought Heitinga is a liability I was surprised people turned on him if that was the reason people booed the sub
It was a double substitution, in which the first sub, the Mirrilas one I believe was booing against the decision, but the Heitinga one unfortunately I think was because he had a stinker, it kind of blended into one big boo
I think Benteke had a lot to do to that decision, he deliberatly targeted Johnny over Distin.
Can I ask, When he took Heitinga off did people boo because:
a) They were booing Heitinga because he had a real stinker of a game
b) They didnt agree with the sub being made?
This is a genuine question, I was quite shocked and whilst I personally have always thought Heitinga is a liability I was surprised people turned on him if that was the reason people booed the sub