When we hired Silva, we hired him for a multitude of reasons not least because of the style of play and systems he has used.
On Monday Night Football there was a discussion near the start of the season with Carragher and Neville about a team (I think Arsenal?) where the manager had stuck to his chosen style but some of the players werent able to adapt.
Carragher argued that the manager should adapt the system to suit the players while Neville said the players need to adapt to the system or be sold.
I agree 100% with Neville, after all you dont expect to hire Allardyce and watch his teams play free flowing football...the same applies with Silva.
Gana being out (in my opinion) is 100% irrelevant. The fact is that we simply dont currently have the correct personnel to play in Silvas preferred style yet. Not least the fact that most of our players are worse than Spurs' or others.
In fact I think he has adapted his style of play a bit to cover for how poor some of our players actually fit into it.
As for being Similar to a Martinez team I strongly disagree in the sense that Silva has always set up his teams to counter attack whereas Martinez preferrs the slow build up.
Richarlison for example is his ideal counter attacking player as hes fast, can go past players and score but also able to press and wants to win. The same goes for all his permanent signings.
Where I think we fall down is in a few areas:
1 -- Coleman, Keane and Zouma are not comfortable passing the ball. Compare their ability here with Spurs defence.
2 -- The centre midfield with Gana, Gomes and Sigurdsson is top heavy. Meaning, the DM should be a playmaker able to drop back and bring the ball forward off the defence, instead we have an ultra defensive player here leaving Gomes to be the one to drop deep.
Once Gomes has the ball the player in front of him is Gana who isnt a centre midfielder. In a counter attacking situation this doesnt matter so much because we would look to get the ball forward quickly, but to build play its certainly a weak area.
However in a counter, as Gana would be the one mostly winning the ball hes also expected to get it to our attacking players and he doesnt have the ability.
3 -- The left side of Digne and Richarlison is what Silva wanted. I dont think anyone could find better signings than them for just over £50mil. They are the epitome of the players he wants. Compare this with the right side of Coleman and Walcott -- because they are so limited we cant build play from the right frequently (aside from lumping in a cross) and the opposition targets that side.
LB Digne
CB - Mina
CM - Gomes
LF - Richarlison / Bernard
Those are the players who Silva clearly wants in the team. The jury is totally out on everyone else.
Once he has players suited to his style and system then things will be clear.
I agree with this in the main, however i cant see the value of Gana in systems Silva has used before.
I think what would work is having a deep lying playmaker and 2 CMs in front of him who are box-to-box with good ability on the ball and the desire to press.
Fantasy fifa stuff. Whole piece of argument base on something or some playing staff we don’t have.
There are major flaws in Digne Richarlison combination if you bother to look. It’s not all about players. So whose job is it to improve them?