I think I saw something similar that said they didn't ask for a change but were just 'advising'.I could have sworn I saw an article on t e BBC saying Forest hadn't asked the PL about Atwell being VAR ref.
I think I saw something similar that said they didn't ask for a change but were just 'advising'.I could have sworn I saw an article on t e BBC saying Forest hadn't asked the PL about Atwell being VAR ref.
Article seems to have disappeared.I think I saw something similar that said they didn't ask for a change but were just 'advising'.
I could have sworn I saw an article on t e BBC saying Forest hadn't asked the PL about Atwell being VAR ref.
I think I saw something similar that said they didn't ask for a change but were just 'advising'.
The initial ball was a tight call and then they just check everything. I'd imagine they took a bit longer to save themselves from the corruption calls again.What exactly were they checking on Branthwaite's goal last night? No one was remotely offside on the replay?
That pretty much means Forest told journalists about it before the press conference about it thinking they would make a big fuss about it and nobody took them on which makes it even better."![]()
Nottingham Forest: Club didn't ask for Attwell to be removed - PGMOL
Nottingham Forest: Club didn't ask for Attwell to be removed - PGMOLwww.bbc.co.uk
BBC Sport has been told Nottingham Forest made contact with PGMOL on Friday to highlight the potential for Nuno Espirito Santo being asked about Stuart Attwell’s appointment in his weekly press conference that afternoon.
As it turned out, the subject was not raised in the press conference.
It is being stressed that at no point were PGMOL asked to change the appointment or that Forest had an issue with Attwell’s involvement in the game.
"
The initial cross from the freekick - ended up being comfortably onside. Was silly just how closely they assessed the rest of the play, but I guess they're terrified of making any mistakes after last weekend.What exactly were they checking on Branthwaite's goal last night? No one was remotely offside on the replay?
I think they were always gonna labour over any call perceived as tight last night, after the Forest farce. The initial ball in was a tight one on Branthwaite, who did win the header to set up the ping-pong for the goal. Seemed to be established almost immediately that he was on, the rest was just pantomime.What exactly were they checking on Branthwaite's goal last night? No one was remotely offside on the replay?
Thanks they didn't show much on the screen re the initial cross. Agreed just silly to take this long (3 minutes?) to look at the rest of the play where everyone looked on!The initial cross from the freekick - ended up being comfortably onside. Was silly just how closely they assessed the rest of the play, but I guess they're terrified of making any mistakes after last weekend.
We have had quite a few desicions go in our favour in the past few weeks.I will say, the referee properly favoured us last night lol
I thought we should have had a pen last night. Jack Harrison was fouled 2nd half where Mcneils effort was blocked. Looked a nailed on pen to me and nothing was mentioned