Firstly I should state that I certainly don't have an agenda (I'm not even sure who would really, on this matter, but there we go).
Secondly, if you think it will remove bias you are unbelievably naïve. All it does is give more opportunity for bias, because it allows people to trawl through footage looking for any excuse at all to give a decision. As has previously been said on here, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see Richarlison and Digne's weekend goals disallowed using VAR, even though United didn't even appeal for the decisions. Dodgy pens will still be down to the refs call, some offside calls will be allowed to carry on to use VAR later while others will be called at the time, and certain camera angles - like Llorente's handball last week - can conveniently not be shown.
Thirdly, I think that all depends on what you like about football. For me, part of the appeal of the game is the immediacy of it, the adrenaline, the euphoria and being part of it. Getting done by a bad decision can be heartbreaking and incredibly annoying, but I don't complain if we win by one. It's part of the game in that sense. I have no interest in sitting in the ground wondering what the hell's going on while they spend 10 minutes working out whether it's a corner or a goal kick, and if they're not going to use it for stuff like that it then it doesn't mean you get the right results anyway, so you just end up getting annoyed with the smaller decisions instead of the bigger ones.