Zezti
Player Valuation: £70m
YouTube takes ads off 'anti-vax' video channels
The World Health Organization said anti-vaccine views were a "top 10 global health threat" in 2019.
No ad revenue for them any more.
Niw Rand Paul is saying it is fine if people don’t get vaccinate their kids - and he is a docter ffs.'cuz we got antibiotics....Texas State Rep flexes his immense mental muscle for us all to see....
“They want to say people are dying of measles. Yeah, in third-world countries they’re dying of measles,” Zedler said Tuesday. “Today, with antibiotics and that kind of stuff, they’re not dying in America.”
Texas Idiot Quote re Measles link
In England - a dramatic decrease in deaths before the introduction of the measles vaccine in 1968
Well, this thread is all a little one-sided. Allow me to throw a stone in the pond.
The consistent newspaper scare tactic of highlighting extreme individual data points to make the argument is scientifically worthless.
Studies are better, but if you want to argue there are no problems associated with vaccinations, then friends I have a carefully maintained bridge that - lucky you - has just become available.
Here’s a piece on measles that illustrates the point that there are always trade-offs - and it may well be that the benefits do not outweigh the drawbacks:
Measles: The New Red Scare
Irrational Measles Fear is being used as a Pretext for Infringing on Individual Rightswww.greenmedinfo.com
Fun fact - the measles vaccine was so powerful that it actually worked before it was released![]()

Niw Rand Paul is saying it is fine if people don’t get vaccinate their kids - and he is a docter ffs.
During a Senate Health Committee hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) criticized the idea that parents should be required to vaccinate their children and perpetuated the notion that vaccines themselves could cause harm.
The speech, which came during the opening moments of the hearing, was framed as an argument in favor of personal liberty, a posture that Paul routinely adopts. But in offering his thoughts, the Kentucky Republican furthered the argument that it is socially reasonable not to vaccinate your kids—a mindset that the scientific community says is already worsening communal health crises.
“As we contemplate forcing parents to choose this or that vaccine, I think it’s important to remember that force is not consistent with the American story, nor is force consistent with the liberty our forefathers sought when they came to America,” said Paul, reading off a paper. “I don't think you have to have one or the other, though. I'm not here to say don’t vaccinate your kids. If this hearing is for persuasion I’m all for the persuasion. I’ve vaccinated myself and I’ve vaccinated my kids. For myself and my children I believe that the benefits of vaccines greatly outweighing the risks, but I still don’t favor giving up on liberty for a false sense of security.”
Paul didn’t just make the case that vaccines should be voluntary, however. He used his platform at the hearing to affirmatively push the perception that they are potentially problematic. “It is wrong to say that there are no risks to vaccines,” said Paul. “Even the government admits that children are sometimes injured by vaccines.” Virtually all medical literature shows that the benefits of vaccines dramatically outweigh the limited risks. And many of the more outlandish conspiracies (including supposed links of vaccines to autism) have been discredited. But, here too, Paul sounded a skeptical note, suggesting that the data simply wasn’t large enough to give parents a convincing case. “Now proponents of mandatory government vaccination argue that parents who refuse to vaccinate their children risk spreading these diseases to immunocompromised community,” he declared. “There doesn't seem to be enough evidence of this happening to be recorded as a statistic.”
I post a piece illustrating some issues with measles vaccination and you come back with a hit piece on a critical study on polio.
Mmmkay.
Actually, we see the same phenomenon here - namely a large decline in the disease before introduction of the vaccine - in this case the spike in incidence was possibly due to introduction of DDT:
View attachment 55621
source: http://vaxinfostarthere.com/did-vaccines-save-us/
But also there was a redefinition of polio in the wake of the vaccine that brought incidence down further - see: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2015/07/polio-wasnt-vanquished-it-was-redefined/
I come back with an article from a epidemiologist with a PhD who highlighted numerous 'errors' (he goes as far as saying egregious) and misguided statements.I post a piece illustrating some issues with measles vaccination and you come back with a hit piece on a critical study on polio.
Mmmkay.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.