Usmanov

[tonka1878]

You're. Our. only hope

 

[tim cahill]

How is he any different from Trump, or he frauds in charge of this country?

I'm pretty sure he's ordered the murder of people that oppose him. That's the difference.

 

[mahermi1]

I'm pretty sure he's ordered the murder of people that oppose him. That's the difference.

Wow that's some accusation matey.

 

[tim cahill]

Wow that's some accusation matey.

I'm talking about Putin by the way.

 

[mahermi1]

I'm talking about Putin by the way.

Oops sorry mate with this being the Usmanov thread I thought different, apologies.

 

[catcherintherye]

I'm pretty sure he's ordered the murder of people that oppose him. That's the difference.

Do we have any evidence for that? Like he's been convicted of it presumably?

 

[gwladysnight]

Given the litigious nature of the individual and his propensity to issue take down notices to blogs and websites it may be better not to discuss the matter.

 

[catcherintherye]

Given the litigious nature of the individual and his propensity to issue take down notices to blogs and websites it may be better not to discuss the matter.

What individual and what matters?

If the accusations are false, you are absolutely correct, best not to discuss things that are untrue. Always a good policy that one.

 

[gwladysnight]

What individual and what matters?

If the accusations are false, you are absolutely correct, best not to discuss things that are untrue. Always a good policy that one.

If you are unsure of the individual and the accusations, why are you suggesting the accusations are untrue.

I think given the litigious nature of the individual and his record for silencing accusations against him, it is better not to put the site at risk of possible legal action.

 

[catcherintherye]

If you are unsure of the individual and the accusations, why are you suggesting the accusations are untrue.

I think given the litigious nature of the individual and his record for silencing accusations against him, it is better not to put the site at risk of possible legal action.

I'm not suggesting the accusations are untrue, the secondary statement is just a broad statement that encompasses all individuals.

The only accusation I have seen on the last couple of page is that Putin has killed people. You're right to say, if there is not proof, people should make such allegations. I'm not aware of any such evidence against him.

 

[Moomin]

I'm not suggesting the accusations are untrue, the secondary statement is just a broad statement that encompasses all individuals.

The only accusation I have seen on the last couple of page is that Putin has killed people. You're right to say, if there is not proof, people should make such allegations. I'm not aware of any such evidence against him.

It's just a massive coincidence that a number of his critics die in strange circumstances.

 

[gwladysnight]

I'm not suggesting the accusations are untrue, the secondary statement is just a broad statement that encompasses all individuals.

The only accusation I have seen on the last couple of page is that Putin has killed people. You're right to say, if there is not proof, people should make such allegations. I'm not aware of any such evidence against him.

That accusation you mention was subject to a public inquiry and the resulting judgement was that the individual had ordered the murder of a Russian spy in 2006.

 

[gwladysnight]

It's just a massive coincidence that a number of his critics die in strange circumstances.

Pretty much the same circumstances either poisoned or fall out of a window straight after criticizing the said individual.

 

[tim cahill]

Do we have any evidence for that? Like he's been convicted of it presumably?

Who's going to convict him??

 

[catcherintherye]

That accusation you mention was subject to a public inquiry and the resulting judgement was that the individual had ordered the murder of a Russian spy in 2006.

Ah ok, who made said judgement then? Only answer if it's in the public domain obviously.