Uni Dissertation Survey Help

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd never heard of Standard Charter, and don't really get what they do,I think it explained in there but I glazed over reading it. Some questions are really bad. Describing yourself as a fan had poor choices.

Oh, and E is before L in the alphabet. It's Everton and Liverpool.
 
I'd never heard of Standard Charter, and don't really get what they do,I think it explained in there but I glazed over reading it. Some questions are really bad. Describing yourself as a fan had poor choices.

Oh, and E is before L in the alphabet. It's Everton and Liverpool.
He’s probably one of them

Wait bad logic ,
If he’s in uni he has some semblance of a brain , can’t be one of them as they are all gobdhites
 
I feel obligated to boycott any products related to companies that sponsor them.

The only one of particular relevance is Nivea. I once had a rather animated conversation with a nice lady working in a pharmacy who eventually understood the reason why I could not purchase Nivea deordorant or any other product in their line, regardless of price or quality.
 
That is a very narrow question for a dissertation to me. My uni lecturers would never have allowed that! Can't get 20000 words out of that question!
 
I have completed but found the repetition, re-emphasise approach of Q’s odd. Also found that if I had completed based on Sportspesa A number of my answers in certain sections would not have been much different.
 
A few strangely worded questions imo. A bit of repetition and the grading of disagree to agree felt un-intuitive on certain questions. If I strongly agree on following Everton everyday, how do I answer on following then once a week? The grading should have been "How often do you follow Everton in the national media? Never ------>Every Day. That approach would have better suited for many of the questions and will supply much more genuine results and metrics. Also, I had to make the assumption that Neither agree or disagree is pretty much the "who cares" option. If not everybody makes that assumption then the results are skewed somewhat. There was too much ambiguity on the possible answers. Only my opinion of course.

Still, i hope the student gets what they want from the questionnaire.
 
A few strangely worded questions imo. A bit of repetition and the grading of disagree to agree felt un-intuitive on certain questions. If I strongly agree on following Everton everyday, how do I answer on following then once a week? The grading should have been "How often do you follow Everton in the national media? Never ------>Every Day. That approach would have better suited for many of the questions and will supply much more genuine results and metrics. Also, I had to make the assumption that Neither agree or disagree is pretty much the "who cares" option. If not everybody makes that assumption then the results are skewed somewhat. There was too much ambiguity on the possible answers. Only my opinion of course.

Still, i hope the student gets what they want from the questionnaire.

They all seem to have that, always figured it's to test how consistent your answers are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top