Transfer Rumour: Adam Johnson, Dedryck Boyata & John Guidetti

Status
Not open for further replies.
ITK info here...beware !

Adam Johnson has been offered to 6 Prem teams, we are one of them. Although City prefer him to join a bottom half prem side, to play more games.
 
Also, from my same source :

"Daniel Agger was interested in a move to city and the Scum(Man United, as he is a Bolton fan) but his wage demands would of made him the highest earning defender in the prem, city gave him a reasonable offer and then today he has said he wants to stay at liverpool"
 
Surely if we were interested in any of their fringe players we would have been clever enough to demand first option as part of the Rodwell deal. Surely?!
 
Surely if we were interested in any of their fringe players we would have been clever enough to demand first option as part of the Rodwell deal. Surely?!

That would mean the club forcing the player to a club, with the player and his agent have a maybe a list of 'other' possibilities.

What we could do, is negotiate a better loand "deal", maybe we pay less than the others in wages etc
 
Apologies if this has already been mentioned in the thread but I'm in a rush and don't have time to check but the Daily Star says Adam Johnson had a bust up with City's manager and is now on his way to Everton on a season long loan. If this is true I'm getting Johnson on the back of my away shirt to complement my 22 Pienaar home shirt.
 
If any City player was going to come to us it would have happened with the Rodwell deal why would we delay it would have been part & parcel of the transfer - i did hear Adam Johnson is on 150 k per week that may have been the stumbling block for us even if we paid half of his wages for a season long loan.
Why we let an England international go to the richest club in the premier for a mere 12 million? with add ons knowing cheski & Unt may have been interested - the ****e paid 20 million for Henderson & 15 million for a lightwieght midfieder from swansea & we just cave in BK the negotiator - Rodwell was 21 ok injury prone but 15 - 20 million should have been the price or a swap deal which did not happen . IMO I can not see why we would have a delay to agree any deals fo any city players??
 
If any City player was going to come to us it would have happened with the Rodwell deal why would we delay it would have been part & parcel of the transfer - i did hear Adam Johnson is on 150 k per week that may have been the stumbling block for us even if we paid half of his wages for a season long loan.
Why we let an England international go to the richest club in the premier for a mere 12 million? with add ons knowing cheski & Unt may have been interested - the ****e paid 20 million for Henderson & 15 million for a lightwieght midfieder from swansea & we just cave in BK the negotiator - Rodwell was 21 ok injury prone but 15 - 20 million should have been the price or a swap deal which did not happen . IMO I can not see why we would have a delay to agree any deals fo any city players??

When we got Jo, the same season we sold Lescott. They were not in the same deal.
 
yes but we got 20 million for Lescott & Jo was a misfit AJ is a class act the 12 million for Rodwell was a poor value why do we always seek add ons if we wanted 17-20 million just get it off the richest club or hang on for other clubs to come in!
 
I can't see us getting Johnson - think the ****e will bag him... and Dempsey.

Guidetti would be a good signing, but I can see a foreign club buying him.

We need an AM, preferably Holtby, who can play wide as well. Other options include Dos Santos from Spurs, or Rakitic fro Sevilla, or maybe even Gourcuff from Lyon (possibly on loan).

In fact, if we got any two of the above midfielders, and a striker (if we're paying for one, I'd prefer Guidetti or Hopper from Celtic to niang I think), itd be a great window for us. Suppose we've got to wait and see :/
 
yes but we got 20 million for Lescott & Jo was a misfit AJ is a class act the 12 million for Rodwell was a poor value why do we always seek add ons if we wanted 17-20 million just get it off the richest club or hang on for other clubs to come in!

That has nothing to do with us getting a player from city in the deal.

You said you cant see why we would nit just get a player in the deal, so I showed you how its possible.
 
I may be wrong but if the AJ loan was a goer it would have happenened in the Rodwell deal - Jo as I stated was a misfit at that time & city wanted to get rid - we decided at a later date - to let Rodwell go with Gibson & Feli injured a week before the season someon or two has to come in PN in midfield is not the answer!
 
That logic is wrong mate, and makes NO sense.

As i said above. We may have negotiated better lon terms on what we pay towards his wages, but they cant force Johnson into moving to us, as AJ and his agent will have a list of Clubs they would move to.

Also, Jo was NOT a misfit at that point, he was a £20 million purchase that could not get a game.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top