I'm just saying Farage is a bona fide 1940s type racist. Anyone trying to show moral integrity by leaving because of robinson has already lost.
It's a tactical point really mate. You're probably right that Farage is more racist, but ultimately he is not a fascist. He's a bit of a maverick Tory who has carved out a bit of a niche for himself critiquing some of the modern moves of the Conservative Party and renouncing the globalistic outlook they have.
Robinson is far closer to being fascist. You can imagine that the storm troopers of the SA would have had a lot of blokes like Robinson around. Not people massively committed to the Nazi ideology but quite willing to have a punch up and from areas of the working class that the trade union movement didn't reach. (Or in Robinson's case he actually owns businesses but you get my point).
Unfortunately most of the discourse around fascism is to present it as ultra-racism. So it's at the end of a scale of racism. It's not a particularly useful frame of reference, because many hardened racists are not fascists, and many fascists are not massively motivated by racism. I've always preferred the paradigm of seeing the social base of the organisation.
The origins of Mussolini's Fasci squads would attack striking workers. They set themselves up as quite a militant opponent of the growing progressive movement in Italy and sought to physically hammer it into oblivion. The Nazi's copied the same strategy (with the SA). The German experience of fascism had a more ideological racist core, the Italian movement much less so, but both sought to control the streets and build a movement to do so.
So what you are saying is correct. However at their core, Farage and Robinson are after very different things. Robinson is looking to build a movement from below to force change. Farage relies upon his charm and skill to do manipulate situations within the bubble of politics. In truth both are a bit of hindrance to the other, hence the conflict.
