No mate, he isn’t. But I’ve already said why the deal isn’t fume-worthy a few posts above.What is it about wanting terrible players to stop taking a wage from the club that makes you a 'da'? Is Tom Davies beyond reproach because he is a local boy?
No mate, he isn’t. But I’ve already said why the deal isn’t fume-worthy a few posts above.What is it about wanting terrible players to stop taking a wage from the club that makes you a 'da'? Is Tom Davies beyond reproach because he is a local boy?
….it’s absolutely not the bottom line. He‘s cheaper for a reason and a relegation will cost the club an awful lot more than signing Martinez or Krauss for relatively low fee.
Not moving the ineffective on at the first opportunity is indefensible, surprised you feel this is sensible.
look at me, i'm a edgy Ming.Tommy D - making the da’s fume without even kicking a ball.
Can you blame him. Everton give him grands a week for clobber and he doesnt even have to play. Would you say no?If he signs he's simply not arsed about football. Blatantly obvious to everyone he needs a fresh start, club selfishly keeping him cos it means we don't need to go searching for a 5th choice central midfielder.
If I was any good at footy and could get a decent wage elsewhere, yeah I would.Can you blame him. Everton give him grands a week for clobber and he doesnt even have to play. Would you say no?
Sense at lastIt's clear our funds are going to be limited again this summer. Our most pressing areas are upfront and someone to replace Mina and a new left back.
CM is our healthiest area of the pitch, and I think most are happy with options ahead of him, Doucoure, Gana, Onana and Garner.
We have more chance of relegation because we didn't use our limited funds as wisely as we could in the most pressing areas than we are for retaining our 5th choice CM.
Fair play mate. Can’t have been easy to admit that.look at me, i'm a edgy Ming.
Did he even get a game under Dyche? If not, that's a head scratcher.
But he isnt any good.If I was any good at footy and could get a decent wage elsewhere, yeah I would.
But if we have limited funds they 100% need to go on forwards. We can't do it all in one window.
I am not party to our finances to say if it's sensible or not sensible, I have no opinion on it, just trying to give people who instantly want to fume a bigger picture scenario.
..…an effective striker has been priority for 18 months but when you get an opportunity to move a totally ineffective player off the books then you have to take it. If Davies leaves it doesn’t make us worst off.
I actually like the lad but you have to move deadwood on or we’ll never improve. It’s a disastrous strategy to keep players who simply can’t help the cause.
Ah right.Came off the bench 9 times for Dyche. We only ever seemed to lose 1 first choice midfielder at a time so never needed to start him.