SS1, from 3.30pm to 8pm, wall-to-wall RS. Unbelieavable. And if they win it it'll be 10 times worse. And people call you a bad Evertonian if you'd rather they didn't win it even if it meant EVerton not finishing 4th!
SS1, from 3.30pm to 8pm, wall-to-wall RS. Unbelieavable. And if they win it it'll be 10 times worse. And people call you a bad Evertonian if you'd rather they didn't win it even if it meant EVerton not finishing 4th!
Well there's no specific law that states its not a foul if the ball is touched regardless of how much contact there is on the player.
Surely you're familiar with the numerous fouls that given every week where players are deemed to have fouled an opponent despite getting some of the ball?
Fair enough if you think that touching the ball should mean its not a foul but FIFA disagree. They make the rules and the refs enforce them.
And those rules state that as Adrian tackled Flannagan carelessly its a foul, even though he touched the ball. If he'd have knocked it away cleanly it wouldn't have been a foul but as the contact was minimal it was.
dont put yourselves through their games lads. we all know whats coming. I actually resisted the urge to watch it today. Just checked the score, laughed and got on with the day.
Well there's no specific law that states its not a foul if the ball is touched regardless of how much contact there is on the player.
Surely you're familiar with the numerous fouls that given every week where players are deemed to have fouled an opponent despite getting some of the ball?
Fair enough if you think that touching the ball should mean its not a foul but FIFA disagree. They make the rules and the refs enforce them.
And those rules state that as Adrian tackled Flannagan carelessly its a foul, even though he touched the ball. If he'd have knocked it away cleanly it wouldn't have been a foul but as the contact was minimal it was.
It wasn't a pen mate. The only person who thought it was a pen was the ref....oh yeah and Rodgers. The keeper goes for the ball, gets the ball and unfortunately Flanagan goes down and the ref ( who can't actually see any of this ) hazards a guess that its a pen. Does the keeper intend to bring the player down? No. Does the keeper get the ball? Yes. No pen.
Keepers in particular have no option but to make contact with the player -- it's why they're allowed to use their hands when going for it. The keeper did everything right -- and within the rules (yours is not a quote but only an interpretation). It was a case quite simply of the ref evening things up after daring to allow the WHU goal. Only the Devil's Own team would get things rebalanced so quickly and so blatantly!
PS - if you want to see a cast iron penalty not awarded check out the foul on McGeady in the last minute today then tell me that Flanagan's was a deserved penalty in comparison.
i see what he means like
its done now tho pointless complainin about it, especially given west hams goal. the ref should get dropped at the very least.
i do feel the ref was just evening it up, most games that wouldnt of been a pen whatever arguments u make. in real time im not sure anybody but the ref thought it was a pen.. slowmos can make a lot of decisions that look straight forward contentious
12 pens for the RS this season and we've had 2.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.