Billysgingham.
Player Valuation: £40m
Let him carry on.Maybe it's time for someone close to him to tell him to pipe down, 2nd or 3rd time he's come out with something and it's backfired on him
Let him carry on.Maybe it's time for someone close to him to tell him to pipe down, 2nd or 3rd time he's come out with something and it's backfired on him
Footballers and coke it is obviously trueDelete this spud, this is against the law.
Its a story from The Scum, so 100% not even true.
"The shadow was over the line". Classic
4/5 the rs, 6/4 City and 20/1 Spurs. If I was having a bet I would say Spurs at 20/1 were the value. 6 points is not that much to make up.....the Reds still odds-on to win the league.
The only problem with those wonderful Spurs odds is that unfortunately I do feel it's likely that they are likely explode at sometime this season, as per usual.4/5 the rs, 6/4 City and 20/1 Spurs. If I was having a bet I would say Spurs at 20/1 were the value. 6 points is not that much to make up.
4/5 the rs, 6/4 City and 20/1 Spurs. If I was having a bet I would say Spurs at 20/1 were the value. 6 points is not that much to make up.
Kopite heads falling off over the injustices of not being awarded a goal that wasn’t and a sending off that wasn’t...
They’re too used to getting their own way bet they’re gutted about VAR.
I'm not as old as you so don't remember that. However, the "ghost goal" that Mourinho has whinged about for years was your classic example of the ref not wanting to give a penalty and send off a goalkeeper and being desperate for the goal to go in so he didn't have to make a decision. It was pretty early in the game, and their record a penalties means it probably helped Chelsea that he gave the goal. They just weren't good enough to take advantage of it. Now that penalty in the quarter final against Arsenal, different story.....and yet they still celebrate the goal v Chelsea in the European Cup semi final.
If you’re as old as me, you might vaguely recall the Reds losing in the 1966 European Cup Winners Cup to a controversial goal where the ball was supposedly out of play.
4/5 the rs, 6/4 City and 20/1 Spurs. If I was having a bet I would say Spurs at 20/1 were the value. 6 points is not that much to make up.
Who do you think has more talent in their team? I would argue Spurs have more strength in depth, it's just a question if the rs continue to get lucky with injuries. Spurs have Man Utd next up, which will be a good test of their self belief, as Utd have always been a bogey team for them. If they can stay in touch, the game at Anfield will be interesting. @Eggs said there are pivotal games that show where a team is at and cited the rs at City last night and us at Spurs in 1985 (a game I went to and I agree). If Spurs can win at Anfield, which they rarely do, and are in touch at that time they certainly would be in the mix.Seven if you take GD into account.
If only they had beaten Wolves I would put them right in the mix.
As it stands though, I think 20/1 is plenty short enough a price on them making up that ground on the RS with less than half the season to play.
Who do you think has more talent in their team? I would argue Spurs have more strength in depth, it's just a question if the rs continue to get lucky with injuries. Spurs have Man Utd next up, which will be a good test of their self belief, as Utd have always been a bogey team for them. If they can stay in touch, the game at Anfield will be interesting. @Eggs said there are pivotal games that show where a team is at and cited the rs at City last night and us at Spurs in 1985 (a game I went to and I agree). If Spurs can win at Anfield, which they rarely do, and are in touch at that time they certainly would be in the mix.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.