Today’s Football 2021/22 Season

[RomanReigns]

why hasn't VAR looked at that

absolute disgrace VAR is

 

[maccavennie]

Great 2nd goal by City, played some lovely football wouldn't you agree @EverTheOptimist

 

[bluelife]

What is Ederson doing.

Defender took it away from him TBF. Would be crying for that as an Everton fan but it’s an ambiguous one

 

[Del-boy]

Be a few sent off here they way it’s going

 

[Tin-Tin]

Be a few sent off here they way it’s going

Hopefully all Newcastle

 

[kenada_blue]

why hasn't VAR looked at that

absolute disgrace VAR is

No doubt would do if it was Chelsea

 

[ste d' indica]

Great 2nd goal by City, played some lovely football wouldn't you agree @EverTheOptimist

I think he refuses to watch the filthy lucre derby on principle mate.

#againstmodernfootball

 

[Chegsy]

Is Joelinton playing central midfield? seems to be behind 2/3 Newcastle players at least.

 

[duncs pigeon]

Great 2nd goal by City, played some lovely football wouldn't you agree @EverTheOptimist

Wonder who he will be backing today? ?

 

[Drico]

Supposedly Chelsea have 5 players out with Covid and asked the premier league to cancel their game today against Wolves, the premier league said no.

The Premier League has a serious issue with unvaccinated players in comparison with the Bundesliga and Serie A where, apparently, vaccination rates are over 90%.

If they were serious about protecting public health, the health of players, and the integrity of the competition, they would refuse postponements for any club with vaccination rates lower than 90%. Why should a club who has 95% vaccination among its players have to endure a postponement because an opponent can only manage 60%? If you cannot play and you don't have a high level of vaccination, you simply forfeit the points.

We all know that vaccinated people can contract COVID too, but they are significantly less likely to get it, pass it on, or suffer severe consequences from it than those who are unvaccinated. So, postponements should only be granted to sides who have 90% vaccination rates and who fulfill other current criteria (less than 14 players, no keeper, etc).

Time to clamp down on needless disruption. We'll have it even if everyone is vaccinated, but vaccination should be the basic step every team takes before playing the victim. It mitigates disruption.

 

[everton fan number one]

The Premier League has a serious issue with unvaccinated players in comparison with the Bundesliga and Serie A where, apparently, vaccination rates are over 90%.

If they were serious about protecting public health, the health of players, and the integrity of the competition, they would refuse postponements for any club with vaccination rates lower than 90%. Why should a club who has 95% vaccination among its players have to endure a postponement because an opponent can only manage 60%? If you cannot play and you don't have a high level of vaccination, you simply forfeit the points.

We all know that vaccinated people can contract COVID too, but they are significantly less likely to get it, pass it on, or suffer severe consequences from it than those who are unvaccinated. So, postponements should only be granted to sides who have 90% vaccination rates and who fulfill other current criteria (less than 14 players, no keeper, etc).

Time to clamp down on needless disruption. We'll have it even if everyone is vaccinated, but vaccination should be the basic step every team takes before playing the victim. It mitigates disruption.

Hear hear

 

[LouReedwalkonthewildside]

The Premier League has a serious issue with unvaccinated players in comparison with the Bundesliga and Serie A where, apparently, vaccination rates are over 90%.

If they were serious about protecting public health, the health of players, and the integrity of the competition, they would refuse postponements for any club with vaccination rates lower than 90%. Why should a club who has 95% vaccination among its players have to endure a postponement because an opponent can only manage 60%? If you cannot play and you don't have a high level of vaccination, you simply forfeit the points.

We all know that vaccinated people can contract COVID too, but they are significantly less likely to get it, pass it on, or suffer severe consequences from it than those who are unvaccinated. So, postponements should only be granted to sides who have 90% vaccination rates and who fulfill other current criteria (less than 14 players, no keeper, etc).

Time to clamp down on needless disruption. We'll have it even if everyone is vaccinated, but vaccination should be the basic step every team takes before playing the victim. It mitigates disruption.

Was reading the other day that the premier league said 25% of players said they “currently do not intend to get a vaccine”.

 

[maccavennie]

Carragher going into high pitch mode, fuming that City scored a 2nd

 

[navidson]

Haven't they already stated the Covid rule for whether games are cancelled?

Sure I saw Steve Gibson yesterday state that if you had a squad of 14 players available (including 1 goalkeeper) that the game went ahead

 

[kenada_blue]

Clarke for City's first goal. Amazing.

Titus Bramble regen returns from suspension