They're the top of the English midfielders. Additionally its all about minutes and game time.
Rogers for example went on 4 loans, played 100 games before moving to Villa. Garner the same. They play regularly.
Tim doesn't. So it's either we bring in another Gana replacement, or have faith in the lad.
Well yeah, that was literally the point?! You can be a top player at 22/23, many of the current England midfielders are in that bracket, and most of the ones that aren't were already England players when they were in that bracket. The point is that
Iroegbunam isn't just a kid starting out in the game, he's going to play one more game before he turns 23, he made his PL debut 5 years ago, he's played over 100 senior games and has played regularly for us all season.
It's absolutely not ALL about minutes and game time, this is the same sort of argument people used to make about Tom Davies and Jonjoe Kenny etc, as if by reaching a certain number of games or having another birthday you magically get better, like a stats boost on a computer game, that's just not how it works. I'm not saying this to slate
Iroegbunam's current level or say he can't get better, the point was just that really he's not
that young or inexperienced that we can just put down every error and poor performance to him being a kid. Someone like Armstrong or
Aznou can get that sort of leeway but there are absolutely loads of players of Iroegbunam's age performing well at the top level and it's daft to think the only reason he's not is because he's not old enough or he only had one loan.